Table 1.
Primary and secondary outcome parameters
Study outcome | Data source | Assessment tool | Items and scales |
---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome | |||
Communication skills addressing PC/EoL-related issues | External rating by study scientists | Study-specific rating manual (adapted version of COM-ON-checklist39,40 and COM-ON-coaching rating scales41) | 13 Items (Likert scale 0-4) on 5 scales:
|
Secondary outcomes | |||
Self-efficacy regarding conversations about PC | Physicians’ self-report | Scale ‘communication’ of the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care Scale (SEPC; valid and reliable questionnaire59) | 8 Items [visual analogue scale from (0) very anxious to (10) very confident] |
Attitudes towards caring for terminal ill patients | Physicians’ self-report | Thanatophobia-Scale,60 valid and reliable59,60 | 7 Items (Likert scale 1-7) |
Communication strategies in discussing PC/EoL-related issues | Physicians’ self-report | Communication about End of Life Survey20; good internal reliability | 19 Items (Likert scale 1-5) on 2 scales:
|
Confidence in dealing with specific PC/EoL-related issues | Physicians’ self-report | Study-specific items | 5 Items (Likert scale 0-4) |
Attitudes towards early communication of PC/EoL-related issues | Physicians’ self-report | Study-specific items | 2 Items (Likert scale 0-4) |
Communication quality from the physicians’ perspective | Physicians’ self-report | Study-specific items | 8 Items (Likert scale 0-4) on 4 scales:
|
Communication quality from the SPs’ perspective | External rating by SPs | Study-specific items inspired by the German version of the questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient-Interaction (QQPPI)61,62 | 15 Items (Likert scale 0-4) on 4 scales:
|
Satisfaction with PALLI-COM training | Physicians’ self-report | Study-specific items | 5 Items (Likert scale 1-5) |
COM-ON, communication in oncology; EoL, end-of-life; PC, palliative care; SP, simulated patient.