Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6;7(6):100742. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100742

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors predicting venous and arterial thrombotic events among NSCLC patients with different molecular drivers

Variable Arterial thrombosis
Venous thrombosis
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
ROS1 versus ALK 1.749 (0.20-14.99) 0.61 1.669 (0.19-14.46) 0.64 0.991 (0.50-1.98) 0.98 1.036 (0.52-2.07) 0.92
ROS1 versus EGFR 4.205 (0.56-31.78) 0.16 3.745 (0.47-30.04) 0.21 0.505 (0.24-1.05) 0.07 0.548 (0.25-1.18) 0.13
EGFR versus ALK 0.42 (0.15-1.14) 0.09 1.96 (1.12-3.43) 0.02
Age (years, ≦60 versus >60) 0.294 (0.12-0.75) 0.01a 0.376 (0.14-1.02) 0.05a 0.817 (0.49-1.36) 0.44 1.022 (0.59-1.77) 0.94
Sex (male versus female) 1.388 (0.60-3.22) 0.44 1.827 (0.61-4.69) 0.21 0.823 (0.49-1.39) 0.47 0.600 (0.32-1.13) 0.11
Smoking (smoker versus nonsmoker) 0.804 (0.27-2.38) 0.69 0.679 (0.20-2.27) 0.53 1.111 (0.62-1.99) 0.72 1.343 (0.67-2.68) 0.40
Stage (per one stage increase) 2.908 (1.07-7.90) 0.04a 2.825 (1.10-7.26) 0.03a 1.410 (1.02-1.94) 0.04a 1.373 (0.98-1.92) 0.06

ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; CI, confidence interval; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HR, hazard ratio; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.

a

P < 0.05.