Richards 2005.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: RCT Follow‐up: day 17–21 |
|
Participants |
Country: USA, central Southeast Setting: 7 long‐term care facilities Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: not reported Number of participants completing the study: 139 (IG 71, CG 68) Baseline characteristics: not reported Group differences: not reported |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: 21 days of individualised social activities for 1–2 hours daily Control: usual care |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Funding |
Sponsorship source:
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sequence generation | Unclear risk | Participants randomly assigned to IG or CG. |
Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | No information. |
Blinding of participants and personnel All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unknown. |
Blinding of participants and personnel Subjective sleep quality (carer ratings) | Unclear risk | Unknown. |
Blinding of participants and personnel Objective sleep measures | Unclear risk | Unknown. |
Blinding of outcome assessors Objective outcome measures | Unclear risk | Not blinded, but probably not relevant (maybe determination of "time in bed" by nursing assistants). |
Blinding of outcome assessors Subjective sleep quality (carer ratings) | Unclear risk | No information available. |
Incomplete outcome data All outcomes | Low risk | Outcomes available for most. No information about group differences. |
Selective outcome reporting | Unclear risk | No protocol identified. |
Other sources of bias | Low risk | None. |