Table 2.
Whole grains: 25–50% | Whole grains: >50% | |
---|---|---|
Crude model | ||
OR | 1.033 | 0.376 |
95% CI | 0.672–1.589 | 0.165–0.856 |
P-value | 0.881 | 0.020 |
Model 1 | ||
OR | 1.033 | 0.376 |
95% CI | 0.672–1.589 | 0.165–0.856 |
P-value | 0.881 | 0.020 |
Model 2 | ||
OR | 1.160 | 0.381 |
95% CI | 0.742–1.814 | 0.161–0.900 |
P-value | 0.516 | 0.028 |
Model 3 | ||
OR | 1.221 | 0.398 |
95% CI | 0.759–1.966 | 0.162–0.983 |
P-value | 0.411 | 0.046 |
Model 4 | ||
OR | 1.252 | 0.393 |
95% CI | 0.774–2.025 | 0.158–0.974 |
P-value | 0.360 | 0.044 |
Model 5 | ||
OR | 1.217 | 0.370 |
95% CI | 0.745–1.990 | 0.147–0.935 |
P-value | 0.433 | 0.036 |
The reference category was WG intake < 25%
In the crude model: no adjustment, whole grains ≤ 25% were taken as reference. In Model 1, sex, age, and school type were adjusted. In Model 2, parental myopia was also included. In Model 3, near-work activity, reading and writing habits, screen time, eye exercise, and visual fatigue times per week were subsequently entered into the model. In Model 4, outdoor time and light environment in the classroom were further entered into the model. In Model 5, the intake of fruits and vegetables were also entered into the model
CI Confidence interval, OR Odds ratio