Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2022 Feb 10;94(7):3091–3102. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04140

Table 5.

Comparison between PNCdirect and Derived PNCmean and PNCdistribution Based on the Combination of In-House Au Mass Fraction with the Mean Particle Size or PSD Simultaneously Obtained in This Study by spICP-MS for Different Commercial AuNPsa

central tendency (PNCmeanb full PSD (PNCdistribution)
30 nm PVP 106.5 ± 7.0 (14.1)c 92.6 ± 6.4 (12.9)c
30 nm bPEI 102.8 ± 10.8 (21.8)c 90.9 ± 9.8 (19.6)c
30 nm PEG 114.7 ± 8.2 (16.4)c 93.4 ± 7.0 (13.9)c
60 nm PVP 102.1 ± 7.4 (14.7)c 83.1 ± 6.1 (12.3)c
60 nm bPEI first lot 92.8 ± 10.5 (20.9)c 77.3 ± 8.6 (17.2)c
60 nm bPEI second lot 97.4 ± 5.7 (11.4)c 83.3 ± 4.9 (9.8)c
60 nm PEG first lot 87.5 ± 2.4 (4.9)c 80.9 ± 2.3 (4.6)c
60 nm PEG second lot 103.7 ± 9.1 (18.3)c 92.2 ± 8.0 (16.0)c
100 nm Citrate 92.0 ± 7.9 (15.8)c 77.1 ± 6.6 (13.2)c
100 nm PVP 96.2 ± 8.1 (16.2)c 84.0 ± 7.1 (14.2)c
100 nm bPEI 101.5 ± 9.7 (19.5)c 91.4 ± 8.7 (17.3)c
100 nm PEG 107.4 ± 10.1 (20.1)c 92.4 ± 8.5 (17.1)c
a

Values indicate the ratio between PNCdirect and derived PNCs, expressed in percentage, and the combined standard uncertainty (uc) associated.

b

Assumes all analyte is present as spherical NPs of the central tendency diameter.

c

All recognized and evaluated sources of bias affecting PNC determinations were included in the parenthetical expanded uncertainty computation that corresponds to U95% C.I.