Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 10;49(1):218–227. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac100

Table 2.

Model Summary of Group Comparisons in Terms of PRSs

Controls High Intermediate Deteriorating Low η 2 Contrasts Within-patient statisticsa
PRS (N = 836) (N = 139) (N = 142) (N = 77) (N = 133) F P
SZ −0.185
−0.25, −0.11
0.343
0.18, 0.50
0.285
0.12, 0.44
0.184
−0.02, 0.39
0.362
0.20, 0.52
0.059 L = H = I = D > C 0.65 .583
BD −0.113
−0.18, −0.04
0.218
0.06, 0.37
0.313
0.15, 0.46
0.192
−0.02, 0.40
0.084
−0.07, 0.24
0.028 I = H > C = D = L 1.22 .301
MD −0.089
−0.15, −0.02
0.025
−0.13, 0.18
0.113
−0.04, 0.27
0.071
−0.14, 0.28
0.303
0.14, 0.46
0.017 L > C = I = D = H 2 .112
IQ 0.072
0.03, 0.14
0.015
−0.14, 0.17
−0.127
−0.28, 0.03
−0.07
−0.29, 0.14
−0.268
−0.43, −0.10
0.013 L < C = H = D = I 1.9 .123

Estimated Marginal Means and 95% CIs. The model is corrected by age, sex, country, and the ten ancestry PC as covariates and weighted by case/control.

High = high-cognitive-functioning; Low = low-cognitive-functioning

aStatistics are relative to within-patient only comparisons by assuming the high-cognitive-functioning group as the baseline category. Between-patient contrasts are represented in the “contrasts” column.