Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep;23(9):2983–2989. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.9.2983

Table 3.

The PCR Cycle for ENOSF1 Variants

Polymorphism Genotypes No. of patients Treatment p value
(n=100) Responders non-responders
TS 5ꞌ UTR 2R2R 25 (25%) 14 (56%) 11 (44%)
2R3R 54 (54%) 36 (66.7%) 18 (33.3%)
3R3R 21 (21%) 7 (33.3%) 14 (66.7%)
TS 5ꞌ UTR SNP 3RC3RC, 2R3RC 50 (50%) 29 (58%) 21 (42%) 0.29
3RG3RG, 2R3RG 23 (23%) 9 (39.1%) 14 (60.9%)
3RC3RG 2 (2%) 0 (0%) 2 (100%)
TS 3ꞌ UTR del6/del6 3 (3%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%) 0.26
del6/ins6 81 (81%) 47 (58%) 34 (42%)
ins6/ins6 16 (16%) 7 (43.8%) 9 (56.3%)
ENOSF1 (rs2612091) AA 29 (29%) 15 (51.7%) 14 (48.3%)
AG 48 (48%) 23 (47.9%) 25 (52.1%)
GG 23 (23%) 19 (82.6%) 4 (17.4%)
ENOSF1 (rs2741171) AA 16 (16%) 11 (68.8%) 5 (31.3%) 0.065
AG 36 (36%) 15 (41.7%) 21 (58.3%)
GG 48 (48%) 31 (64.6%) 17 (35.4%)

* The χ2 test was used for the correlation study; ** The Monte-Carlo test used for TS 5ꞌ UTR SNP and TS 3ꞌ UTR polymorphisms; * A p-value < 0.05 was considered as significant