Table 2.

Relative effect sizes of CER efficacy after the intervention.

SUCRA 97.8%
E	SUCRA 66.8%
2.10 (0.82, 5.37)	C	SUCRA 62.6%
2.21 (0.94, 5.19)	1.05 (0.50, 2.22)	D	SUCRA 47.8%
2.82 (1.24, 6.38)	1.34 (0.63, 2.84)	1.27 (0.66, 2.46)	B	SUCRA 26.1%
3.61 (1.40, 9.29)	1.72 (0.83, 3.55)	1.63 (0.76, 3.52)	1.28 (0.63, 2.60)	A	SUCRA 0.1%
8.30 (3.87, 17.83)	3.95 (2.27, 6.89)	3.75 (2.26, 6.22)	2.95 (1.74, 5.00)	2.30 (1.26, 4.19)	ST

Treatments were ranked in order of their likelihood of being the best treatment. The above data represent the confidence interval. The bold font indicates that there was a statistically significant difference between the two treatments. BA, body acupuncture; SA, scalp acupuncture; TA, tongue acupuncture; SBA, scalp-body acupuncture; STA, scalp-tongue acupuncture; ST, speech training; CER, clinical effective rate; SUCRA, The surface under the cumulative ranking curve.