Table 2.
Ratings for hunger, mood, and stress across all studies.
| Hunger | Mood | Stress | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal-based | Plant-based | Animal-based | Plant-based | Animal-based | Plant-based | |
| App-based (5-point) n = 16,135 | ||||||
| Pre | 3.81 ± 1.1 | 3.69 ± 1.1 | 3.48 ± 1.0 | 3.52 ± 1.0 | — | — |
| Post | 1.80 ± 1.2 | 1.71 ± 1.1 | 3.74 ± 1.0 | 3.72 ± 1.0 | — | — |
| Main effect plant-based vs. animal-based |
b = − 0.10, t = − 6.8 p < 0.001 |
b = 0.01, t = 0.80 p < 0.001 |
— | — | ||
| Interaction effect plant-based*post-meal |
b = 0.03, t = 1.3 p = 0.20 |
b = −0.06, t = −3.6 p < 0.001 |
— | — | ||
| Study 2 (10-point) n = 173 | ||||||
| Pre | 7.28 ± 1.4 | 6.87 ± 1.8 | 6.6 ± 1.9 | 6.7 ± 1.7 | 4.8 ± 2.4 | 5.2 ± 2.5 |
| Post | 1.98 ± 2.0 | 1.85 ± 1.5 | 7.6 ± 1.6 | 7.1 ± 1.8 | 3.7 ± 2.2 | 4.2 ± 2.6 |
| Main effect plant-based vs. animal-based |
b = − 0.27, t = − 1.4 p < 0.17 |
b = − 0.18, t = − 0.79 p < 0.43 |
b = 0.46, t = 1.3 p < 0.18 |
|||
| Interaction effect plant-based*post-meal |
b = 0.28, t = 0.8 p = 0.42 |
b = −0.68, t = − 2.3 p < .0196 |
b = 0.08, t = 0.3 p = 0.80 |
|||
| Study 3 (10-point) n = 71 | ||||||
| Pre | 6.7 ± 1.7 | 6.6 ± 1.9 | 6.2 ± 2.1 | 6.1 ± 2.1 | 4.4 ± 1.9 | 4.9 ± 2.5 |
| Post | 2.1 ± 2.1 | 2.4 ± 1.9 | 7.0 ± 1.8 | 6.2 ± 2.2 | 3.4 ± 1.7 | 4.0 ± 2.2 |
| Main effect plant-based vs. animal-based |
b = − 0.11, t = − 0.4 p < 0.71 |
b = −0.64, t = −1.5 p < 0.12 |
b = 0.58, t = 1.3 p < 0.18 |
|||
| Interaction effect plant-based*post-meal |
b = −0.64, t = −1.0 p = 0.32 |
b = −0.66, t = −1.4 p < 0.17 |
b = 0.002, t = 0.005 p < 0.996 |
|||
Significant effects between linear mixed models model comparisons are marked in bold. Note, that due to multiple comparison correction alpha-level was set to 0.05/3 = 0.0167. P values represent the ANOVA model comparison of linear mixed models with fixed and random effects.
Mean ± SD. Significant models of interest compared to the null model in bold (LMM comparison p < 0.001).