Table 7.

Moderation analysis.

Variable	Moderator	Estimate	t	p	Moderator effect present?
Affective commitment	Age	−0.075	−1.752	0.330	No
	Gender	0.009	1.746	0.331	No
	Study design	−0.383	−2.525	0.240	No
	Country	0.061	0.148	0.907	No
	Year	0.002	0.032	0.980	No
Affective trust	Age	0.039	1.127	0.377	No
	Gender	0.018	1.696	0.232	No
	Study design	−0.129	−0.422	0.714	No
	Country	−0.241	−1.111	0.382	No
	Year	0.084	0.866	0.478	No
Creativity	Age	−0.013	−1.985	0.069	Yes, the larger the age, the smaller the correlation
	Gender	0.002	0.712	0.489	No
	Study design	−0.303	−2.551	0.024	Yes, the correlation is larger when using a cross-temporal rather than time-lagged research design
	Country	–	–	–	–
	Year	0.041	1.326	0.208	No
Engagement	Age	−0.005	−0.264	0.802	No
	Gender	−0.003	−0.822	0.448	No
	Study design	0.241	2.966	0.031	Yes, the correlation is smaller when using a cross-temporal rather than time-lagged research design
	Country	0.020	0.135	0.898	No
	Year	0.024	1.026	0.352	No
LMX	Age	0.121	1.533	0.200	No
	Gender	0.007	0.552	0.610	No
	Study design	0.274	1.076	0.342	No
	Country	−0.579	−2.679	0.055	Yes, the correlation is smaller when data is collected from eastern rather than non-eastern countries
	Year	−0.062	−1.270	0.273	No
Organizational identification	Age	−0.031	−0.750	0.508	No
	Gender	−0.018	−2.993	0.058	Yes, the correlation is smaller when the proportion of females increases
	Study design	0.258	1.234	0.305	No
	Country	–	–	–	–
	Year	−0.040	−0.891	0.439
Task performance	Age	0.035	3.201	0.024	Yes, the larger the age, the larger the correlation
	Gender	−0.005	−1.057	0.339	No
	Study design	−0.241	−1.855	0.123	No
	Country	–	–	–	–
	Year	0.136	2.794	0.038	Yes, the larger the year, the larger the correlation
Voice	Age	−0.027	−1.342	0.207	No
	Gender	0.004	1.210	0.252	No
	Study design	−0.156	−1.337	0.208	No
	Country	–	–	–	–
	Year	−0.040	−1.010	0.334	No