Table 1.
Overview of number of interventions in the health plans of farms attributed per category as identified by the BEAT assessment and shown per zone and country.
| The Netherlands |
Cyprus |
Greece |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk category | Zone | Interventions | Realized | BEAT score | Interventions | Realized | BEAT score | Interventions | Realized | BEAT score | Total BEAT |
| Introduction of purchased animals | Green | 0 | 0.65 | 7 | 7 | 0.66 | 15 | 0 | 0.13 | 0.43 | |
| Introduction by bedding/enrichment materials | Green | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Introduction by contaminated feed | Green | 0 | 0.98 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | 15 | 0 | 0.50 | 0.59 | |
| Introduction by drinking water | Green | 1 | 1 | 0.76 | 21 | 19 | 0.68 | 60 | 30 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| Thinning | Green | 2 | 1 | 0.14 | 14 | 0 | 0.05 | 45 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
| Depopulation | Green | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.09 | |||
| Spread of pathogens between consecutive flocks | Green | 2 | 2 | 0.85 | 7 | 2 | 0.82 | 15 | 0 | 0.58 | 0.73 |
| Spread between farm broiler houses | Green | 3 | 3 | 0.57 | 7 | 0 | 0.67 | 15 | 0 | 0.87 | 0.71 |
| Removal of dead birds from the house | Green | 5 | 3 | 0.64 | 7 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.76 | |
| Rodents/insects | Green | 2 | 1 | 0.93 | 0 | 0.89 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.95 | ||
| Wild birds | Green | 0 | 0.93 | 7 | 2 | 0.29 | 0 | 0.20 | 0.50 | ||
| Outdoor broiler areas | Green | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.60 | 0.61 | |||
| Cleaning and disinfection of entree room | Green | 0 | 0.80 | 0 | 0.35 | 15 | 15 | 1.00 | 0.80 | ||
| Cleaning and disinfection of broiler house | Green | 1 | 1 | 0.95 | 0 | 1.00 | 30 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.98 | |
| Total Green | Green | 16 | 12 | 77 | 31 | 210 | 45 | ||||
| Access of personnel/visitors | Orange-green | 22 | 19 | 0.65 | 35 | 10 | 0.21 | 60 | 45 | 0.75 | 0.61 |
| Access of materials | Orange-green | 0 | 0.51 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.12 | 0.34 | |||
| Access of wild birds (and pest animals) | Orange-green | 0 | 0.64 | 0 | 0.72 | 0 | 0.62 | 0.65 | |||
| Total orange-green | 22 | 19 | 35 | 10 | 60 | 45 | |||||
| Position of broiler houses relative to internal-external logistic lines | Orange | 2 | 2 | 0.64 | 7 | 0 | 1.00 | 15 | 0 | 0.67 | 0.72 |
| Cadaver storage | Orange | 0 | 0.96 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.50 | 0.68 | |||
| Manure storage | Orange | 0 | 0.86 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.53 | 0.75 | |||
| Feed storage | Orange | 2 | 2 | 0.75 | 7 | 0 | 0.50 | 15 | 0 | 0.50 | 0.60 |
| Storage of bedding materials | Orange | 1 | 0 | 0.79 | 0 | 1.00 | 15 | 0 | 0.00 | 0,50 | |
| Other poultry species | Orange | 0 | 0.89 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.75 | 0.85 | |||
| Other farm animal species | Orange | 0 | 0.63 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.72 | 0.74 | |||
| Rodents/insects | Orange | 0 | 0.85 | 0 | 0.67 | 15 | 0 | 0.33 | 0.60 | ||
| Wild birds | Orange | 0 | 0.79 | 0 | 0.72 | 15 | 0 | 0.30 | 0.57 | ||
| Contaminated farm yard surfaces | Orange | 0 | 0.96 | 0 | 0.71 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.51 | |||
| Cleaning and disinfection of farm yard | Orange | 2 | 2 | 0.68 | 7 | 0 | 0.22 | 1 | 0 | 0.49 | 0.51 |
| Total Orange | 7 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 76 | 0 | |||||
| Access of personnel/visitors | Red-orange | 11 | 7 | 0.53 | 7 | 2 | 0.53 | 6 | 0 | 0.74 | 0.62 |
| Access of transport vehicles | Red-orange | 4 | 4 | 0.38 | 7 | 2 | 0.64 | 15 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.28 |
| Access of wild birds (and pest animals) | Red-orange | 2 | 1 | 0.74 | 0 | 0.67 | 0 | 0.64 | 0.69 | ||
| Separation orange and red zone by fence/wire and entrance gate | Red-orange | 3 | 2 | 0.79 | 7 | 4 | 0.57 | 3 | 0 | 0.07 | 0.44 |
| Arrival sign | Red-orange | 4 | 2 | 0.57 | 0 | 0.71 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.78 | ||
| Registration of visitors | Red-orange | 1 | 1 | 0.86 | 7 | 5 | 0.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.75 | |
| Total Red-Orange | 25 | 17 | 28 | 13 | 24 | 0 | |||||
| Poultry density in area | Red | 0 | 0.79 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 0.13 | 0.42 | |||
| Distance to nearest poultry farm | Red | 0 | 0.64 | 0 | 0.36 | 2 | 0 | 0.43 | 0.50 | ||
| Shortest distance to public road with daily animal transports | Red | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 0.57 | 0 | 0.13 | 0.28 | |||
| Spread of poultry litter/manure on surrounding fields | Red | 0 | 0.80 | 0 | 1.00 | 1 | 0 | 0.56 | 0.74 | ||
| Spread of other farm animal litter/manure on surrounding fields | Red | 0 | 0.26 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.71 | 0.40 | |||
| Mowing of premises | Red | 1 | 1 | 0.23 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 0.50 | 0.34 | ||
| Ploughing in surrounding fields | Red | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0.07 | 0 | 0.50 | 0.40 | |||
| Water ponds present within radius of 1 km | Red | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 0.57 | 0 | 0.87 | 0.64 | |||
| Migratory birds route in the vicinity within radius of 1 km | Red | 0 | 0.71 | 0 | 0.71 | 0 | 0.93 | 0.81 | |||
| Pest animal pressure in surroundings | Red | 0 | 0.75 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.33 | |||
| Parking areas visitors/farm employees in red zone | Red | 4 | 3 | 0.43 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.78 | ||
| Separation "dirty"- "clean" area: location of dirty road in red zone | Red | 2 | 1 | 0.29 | 7 | 7 | 0.48 | 15 | 0 | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| Total red | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 0.43 | ||||
The number of realized interventions (Realized) per risk category and the average relative BEAT score (BEAT score) per category of the farms are shown, and the average relative BEAT score per country for each risk category.
The total BEAT is the average relative BEAT score of that risk category across all countries. Per zone, the total number of interventions is also indicated.
Abbreviation: BEAT, BiosEcurity Assessment Tool.