Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;52(16):3948–3956. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000799

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

(a) A typical decision-tree and financial outcomes up to a depth of 3 starting from state 2. Numbers in each box denote the state number. (b) Same decision-tree starting, aversively pruned due to a large negative outcome at the first step. Note that this aversive pruning also avoids the large positive transition, but almost halves the computational load.