A comparison of the electrocatalytic activities of various catalysts towards glycerol electrooxidation.
| Catalyst | [Glycerol] mol L−1 | [NaOH] mol L−1 | I (A g−1) at 1.6 V vs. RHE | Scan rate (mV s−1) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoNi@C | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.063 | 50 | 20 |
| FeNi@C | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.052 | 50 | 20 |
| FeCoNi@C | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.065 | 50 | 20 |
| Ni@(CCE)b | 0.1 | 1.0 | 24.372 | 50 | 41 |
| NiCu@CCE | 0.1 | 1.0 | 43.871 | 50 | 41 |
| NiCo@CCE | 0.1 | 1.0 | 116.990 | 50 | 41 |
| Porous Cu/Cu2O | 0.1 | 0.1 | 6.6 at 1.5 V | 10 | 56 |
| 20 mM Ni doped porous Cu/Cu2O | 0.1 | 0.1 | 6.423 | 10 | 57 |
| Ni wire | 0.1 | 1 M KOH | 0.47 | 50 | 21 |
| Ni wire/SWa | 0.1 | 1 M KOH | 1.5 | 50 | 21 |
| Ni90%Bi10% | 0.1 | 1 M KOH | 360 | 50 | 58 |
| NiCu@CF | 0.008 | 0.2 | 140.892 | 10 | This work |
| Ni85%Cu15%@CF | 0.008 | 0.2 | 118.695 | 10 |
a
(CCE) carbon ceramic electrode.
b
(SW) applying sinusoidal wave.