Table 6.
Ranking of SUCRA probabilities for each outcome indicator
| Intervention | Total effective rate | Sperm concentration | Sperm motility a + b% | Sperm motility a% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUCRA | RANK | SUCRA | RANK | SUCRA | RANK | SUCRA | RANK | |
| WA | 80.1 | 1 | 93.4 | 1 | 65.8 | 5 | 78.1 | 2 |
| EA | 75.2 | 2 | 63.7 | 5 | 82.0 | 1 | 96.6 | 1 |
| 2 Hz TEAS | 67.7 | 4 | 56.3 | 7 | 74.1 | 3 | 33.2 | 7 |
| 100 Hz TEAS | 62.9 | 6 | 30.2 | 8 | 75.0 | 2 | 70.5 | 3 |
| MB | 75.0 | 3 | 83.7 | 2 | 21.5 | 9 | – | – |
| MA | 28.8 | 9 | 63.8 | 4 | 71.4 | 4 | 37.0 | 6 |
| VCL | 44.0 | 8 | 16.7 | 9 | 30.4 | 8 | – | – |
| HBO | 64.6 | 5 | 65.9 | 3 | 64.5 | 6 | 60.6 | 4 |
| CM | 44.2 | 7 | 62.4 | 6 | 47.6 | 7 | 60.2 | 5 |
| SI | 10.3 | 10 | 13.5 | 10 | 12.9 | 10 | 12.9 | 8 |
| NT | 0.2 | 11 | 0.4 | 11 | 4.8 | 11 | 0.8 | 9 |
| Intervention | Adverse reaction | FSH | LH | T | ||||
| SUCRA | RANK | SUCRA | RANK | SUCRA | RANK | SUCRA | RANK | |
| WA | 68.8 | 2 | 71.4 | 3 | 62.8 | 4 | 75.8 | 2 |
| EA | 60.8 | 4 | 74.5 | 2 | 82.7 | 2 | 99.4 | 1 |
| 2 Hz TEAS | 38.1 | 8 | 68.9 | 5 | 96.8 | 1 | 35.2 | 8 |
| 100 Hz TEAS | 38.8 | 7 | 33.1 | 7 | 39.3 | 6 | 35.3 | 7 |
| MB | 20.4 | 11 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| MA | 27.7 | 10 | 63.5 | 6 | 78.6 | 3 | 68.0 | 3 |
| VCL | 58.2 | 5 | 13.6 | 9 | 24.9 | 9 | 40.3 | 6 |
| HBO | 55.2 | 6 | 85.4 | 1 | 37.0 | 7 | 54.2 | 5 |
| CM | 31.0 | 9 | 69.5 | 4 | 41.6 | 5 | 55.6 | 4 |
| SI | 62.9 | 3 | 13.7 | 8 | 28.8 | 8 | 18.3 | 9 |
| NT | 88.0 | 1 | 6.6 | 10 | 7.6 | 10 | 17.8 | 10 |