Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;108(6):527–538. doi: 10.1645/22-21

Table I.

Summary of longitudinal evaluation of 5 tanks of zebrafish with Pseudoloma neurophilia infections. Each cell represents results, positive (+) or negative (−) following ddPCR testing of 2 (1 L) water samples taken from a tank with flowing water (flow), with water turned off for 8 hr (static) or water from a group spawn (spawn). DNA extracts from each filter sample were evaluated in triplicate. Number of positive replicates/tanks of the 6 replicates are in parentheses in each cell (No.). A positive score for a tank sample occurred when at least 1 of the 2 L samples showed detection of 2 or more replicates. Eggs from successful spawns were collected, counted, and equally divided into 10% pools and tested. Unless the spawns produced a small number of eggs, such as tank 1 in November and tank 2 in January, which has a total of 6 and 5 eggs (respectively), they were grouped into 1 pool. All egg samples were negative. Neural tissues from fish were evaluated by qPCR after the last water and spawn samples were collected.

Tank No.
Flow
Static
Spawn
Total No. of eggs
% Positive tank samples
Tissue samples positive by QPCR (%)
Nov
Dec
Jan
Nov
Dec
Jan
Nov
Dec
Jan
Nov
Dec
Jan
Tank 1 − (1) + (3) − (0) − (2) + (4) + (3) + (3) + (5) + (5) 6 0 0 (67) (54)
Tank 2 − (1) + (6) + (3) + (6) + (6) + (6) + (4) + (3) + (5) 159 83 5 (89) (83)
Tank 3 − (1) + (3) − (1) − (1) + (5) − (1) + (4) + (4) + (4) 0 0 90 (56) (42)
Tank 4 + (3) + (6) − (2) + (3) + (5) + (5) − (2) + (5) − (1) 0 30 360 (67) (68)
Tank 5 + (3) − (1) − (1) + (3) + (6) + (6) − (0) + (4) + (5) 0 80 72 (67) (63)
% positive by sampling method (47) (80) (80)