Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;43(17):5167–5179. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25992

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Resting‐state functional connectivity (FC) in bilateral IS1/SS1/M1. (a) When IS1 was used as the seed, resting‐state FC in bilateral IS1 was not significantly different between PHN patients and HC (ns, no significant; middle panel); resting‐state FC in bilateral IS1 was not correlated with SF‐MPQ ratings in PHN patients (right panel). (b) When SS1 was used as the seed, PHN patients exhibited weaker resting‐state FC in bilateral SS1 than HC (*p < .05; middle panel); resting‐state FC in bilateral SS1 was negatively correlated with SF‐MPQ ratings in PHN patients (right panel). (c) When M1 was used as the seed, resting‐state FC between left and right M1 was not significantly different between PHN patients and HC (ns, no significant; middle panel); resting‐state FC in bilateral M1 was not correlated with SF‐MPQ ratings in PHN patients (right panel).