Table 2.
Study ID, ref. | Study design | Sample size | Age (years) | Main findings | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jackson-Cowan et al. [24] | Population-based cross-sectional study | N = 109 483 | 2–17 | Childhood AD was significantly associated with developmental delay (aOR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.40–1.40) (p < 0.001) and ADD/ADHD (aOR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.20–1.42) (p < 0.001) | Did not control for sedating medications that may have influenced cognitive function (e.g. antihistamines) |
Kandelaki et al. [25] | Cross-sectional study | N = 639 | 5–6 | 36% of children with language delays and problems in internalisation and externalisation reported comorbid AD | Cross-sectional design prevented the inclusion of follow-up data |
Silverberg et al. [26] | Prospective study |
Baseline: N = 366 Follow-up: N = 245 |
18–88 |
Baseline: 66.8% self-reported ≥1 symptom of cognitive dysfunction (e.g. slowed thinking, difficulty concentrating) Follow-up: 5.4% showed moderate and 5.2% showed severe PROMIS cognitive function T-scores |
The baseline cognitive function questionnaire was self-administered and may be subject to recall bias |
Vittrup et al. [23] | Population-based longitudinal study | 157 113 | 0–18 |
Childhood AD was significantly associated with ADHD HR: 1.89 (95% CI: 1.56–2.29) |
AD severity was classified based on the proxy of medication use, allowing for misclassification bias |