Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 25;28(1):108–117. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01829-8

Table 2.

Summary of study characteristics.

Study ID, ref. Study design Sample size Age (years) Main findings Limitations
Jackson-Cowan et al. [24] Population-based cross-sectional study N = 109 483 2–17 Childhood AD was significantly associated with developmental delay (aOR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.40–1.40) (p < 0.001) and ADD/ADHD (aOR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.20–1.42) (p < 0.001) Did not control for sedating medications that may have influenced cognitive function (e.g. antihistamines)
Kandelaki et al. [25] Cross-sectional study N = 639 5–6 36% of children with language delays and problems in internalisation and externalisation reported comorbid AD Cross-sectional design prevented the inclusion of follow-up data
Silverberg et al. [26] Prospective study

Baseline: N = 366

Follow-up:

N = 245

18–88

Baseline: 66.8% self-reported ≥1 symptom of cognitive dysfunction (e.g. slowed thinking, difficulty concentrating)

Follow-up: 5.4% showed moderate and 5.2% showed severe PROMIS cognitive function T-scores

The baseline cognitive function questionnaire was self-administered and may be subject to recall bias
Vittrup et al. [23] Population-based longitudinal study 157 113 0–18

Childhood AD was significantly associated with ADHD

HR: 1.89 (95% CI: 1.56–2.29)

AD severity was classified based on the proxy of medication use, allowing for misclassification bias