Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Oct 12;74(1):2–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202200047

Established outpatient care and follow-up after acute psychiatric service use in youth and young adults

Julie Hugunin 1, Maryann Davis 2, Celine Larkin 3, Jonggyu Baek 4, Brain Skehan 5, Kate L Lapane 6
PMCID: PMC9812848  NIHMSID: NIHMS1807997  PMID: 36223162

Abstract

Objective:

This study explores follow-up after hospitalization and emergency room use for mental health among youth and young adults with private insurance.

Method:

The IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Database (2013-2018) was used to identify people 12-27 years with a mental health hospitalization (n=97,152) or emergency room use (n=108,576). Factors associated with outpatient mental health follow-up within 7 and 30 days of discharge were determined using logistic models with generalized estimating equations accounting for state variation; adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) are reported.

Results:

Of those hospitalized, 42.7% received follow-up within 7 days and 64.7% within 30 days. Of those with emergency room use, 28.6% received follow-up within 7 days and 46.4% within 30 days. Type of established outpatient care predicted follow-up, after hospitalization and after emergency room use. As compared to those with no established care, odds of follow-up within 7 days were highest in those with both mental health and primary care (hospitalization aOR=2.81, 95% CI=2.68-2.94; emergency room aOR=4.06, 95% CI=3.72-4.42), followed by mental health care only (hospitalization aOR=2.57, 95% CI=2.45-2.70; emergency room aOR=3.48, 95% CI=3.17-3.82), and primary care only (hospitalization aOR=1.20, 95% CI=1.15-1.26; emergency room aOR=1.22, 95% CI=1.16-1.28). Similar trends were observed within 30 days of acute service use.

Conclusion:

Follow-up care after acute mental health service use among youth and young adults was suboptimal. Having established mental health care strongly predicted follow-up, and more so than having established primary care. Improving engagement with outpatient mental healthcare providers may increase rates of follow-up care.

Introduction

In the past year, the Surgeon General and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have warned of an accelerating mental health crisis among adolescents.1,2 During 2020, 44.2% of high school students experienced persistent sadness or hopelessness, 19.9% seriously considered suicide, and 9.0% attempted suicide.3 Rates of hospitalization and emergency department use for mental illness and substance use disorder are increasing.4,5 In 2012, mental health and substance use disorders were among the top 10 reasons for hospital stays among teenagers6, and from 2009 to 2015 mental health related emergency room visits increased by 56.4% in pediatric patients and 40.8% in adults.7

Efforts to improve quality of care for youth and young adults with mental health conditions include increasing rates of follow-up care after acute mental health service use (i.e., hospitalizations, emergency room use). Follow-up with a mental health care provider within 7 and 30 days are national quality measures8,9 associated with improved medication adherence, decreased suicide risk, and increased healthcare engagement long-term.10,11 Although about half of Medicaid-insured youth and young adults receive outpatient mental health follow-up,10,12 estimates among youth and young adults with private insurance are unknown. Youth and young adults may experience unique challenges given they typically interact with multiple systems and agencies13,14 and may be underserved in current mental health systems.15

This study sought to determine rates and predictors of mental health follow-up within 7 and 30 days of a hospitalization and emergency room use for a mental health condition among youth and young adults with private insurance and examine differences by age.

Methods

This study was deemed non-human subjects research by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School.

Stakeholder engagement

Stakeholders included representatives from key organizations (see Supplemental Table S1). Two, 1.5-hour virtual forums elicited stakeholder perspectives (one before study launch to ensure that the research generated relevant knowledge, one to share preliminary findings to gain real-world insight in data interpretation).

Dataset

This retrospective cohort study used the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Database (2013-2018), one of the largest collections of nationally representative patient data in the United States.16 These data include comprehensive, de-identified health insurance claims across the continuum of care (e.g., inpatient, outpatient, carve-out behavioral healthcare) from large employers and health plans who provide private healthcare coverage for employees, spouses, dependents.16

The inpatient admissions table summarizes information about a hospital admission using certain criteria (e.g., claims related to room and board). This table includes all encounters associated with an admission and includes a variable indicating the principal diagnosis (i.e., the main reason for admission). The outpatient services table includes claims for services in doctors’ offices, hospital outpatient facility, and emergency rooms. Emergency room use claims were defined by place of service, revenue, procedure, or service subcategory code (Table S2).17 This table includes the first-listed diagnosis associated with the emergency room claim.

Study sample

We created two samples defined by healthcare setting: 1) inpatient hospitalization; and 2) emergency room. Both included patients aged 12-27 years who had an acute event for a mental health diagnosis (i.e., major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders, anxiety disorders/phobias, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and disruptive disorders) (Table S3). Individuals with a self-harm or suicide-related code in any of the diagnoses coded were included. We included patients with a primary diagnosis of eating disorders or substance use who had a mental health diagnosis or self-harm/suicide-related claim coded in the remaining diagnosis codes. Those still receiving care at discharge from an inpatient hospitalization (i.e., transferred to another facility, still a patient, other, or missing) were excluded. Patients were excluded if mental health/substance use claims were not covered or were suppressed. If an emergency room visit resulted in an inpatient admission, the patient was included in the inpatient sample rather than the emergency room sample. Those not continuously enrolled during the study period, missing information on health plan coverage, or who had an inpatient/ emergency room visit before an outpatient follow-up visit were excluded. The final samples included 97,152 patients (inpatient) and 108,576 patients (emergency room) (Figures S1 and S2).

Outcome measures

We created two binary outcome variables: outpatient mental health follow-up within 7 and 30 days of discharge from an acute mental health visit. This aligns with national quality measures defined in the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS).8,9 HEDIS specifications of follow-up exclude acute visits that are followed by re-admission to inpatient care settings within 30 days of the initial acute care visit; given clinical relevance, we included these visits only if outpatient follow-up care occurred prior to the re-admission. Outpatient mental healthcare was defined as a visit with a specialty mental health provider (e.g., psychiatrist, child psychiatrist) for evaluation, management, psychotherapy, or other psychiatric care including psychiatric facility partial hospitalizations (Table S4).

Secondary outcomes included any follow-up care (primary care and outpatient mental health care). Primary care use included visits with a primary care provider (e.g., internal medicine, family practice, pediatrician) for health promotion, disease prevention, health maintenance and patient education in an outpatient setting.18 Outpatient care was categorized as primary care or mental health care using provider type, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and place of service; outpatient mental healthcare was also defined using specific place of service or service sub-category codes (Table S4). Analysis for those with co-morbid substance use examined substance use specific follow-up care (Table S5).

Exposure measure

The primary determinant was established outpatient care, defined as at least one visit with a provider in the six months prior to the acute mental health event. Use in the six months prior to acute care was explored given previous research examining established care and follow-up rates.12 Established outpatient care was categorized as primary care and mental health care, mental health care only, primary care only, or none, using the outpatient definitions described above.

Covariates

Covariates included age at time of service (12-17 or 18-27 years), sex (male/female), healthcare plan type, mental health diagnosis, whether the event was self-harm/suicide-related, and medical complexity. Healthcare plan type was categorized as high deductible health plan/consumer driven health plans, basic/ major medical/ comprehensive plan, preferred provider organization, and all others (exclusive provider organization, health maintenance organization, point-of-service). Acute health service use was categorized as self-harm/ suicided-related if the event included any diagnosis code related to suicide (Table S3). The inpatient sample included length of hospital stay (≤3 days, 4 to 6 days, 7 to 10 days, or ≥11 days) and whether the individual left against medical advice. Medical complexity was measured by the Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm (less conservative version 3.1).19 Mental health diagnoses used to define our sample were removed from the algorithm. Individuals were classified as complex chronic (>1 body system involved or ≥1 progressive or malignant condition), non-complex chronic (1 body system involved, not progressive/malignant), and without chronic disease.

Data Analysis

We estimated the proportion of patients who received outpatient mental health care within 7 days and 30 days and described characteristics overall and by the presence of outpatient mental health follow-up. We focused on absolute differences of ≥5% because with large sample sizes trivial differences are likely statistically significant. We quantified the association of established outpatient care with the presence of outpatient mental health follow-up after an acute mental health event, adjusting for available patient-level covariates using generalized estimating equation models to account for clustering by state. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were estimated. Analyses examined the distribution of established outpatient care by covariates (Table S6S7), factors associated with any follow-up (Table S8S9), and stratified by 2-year age intervals (Tables S10S11), and mental health diagnosis (Tables S12S13).

Results

Hospitalizations

The average age was 18.9 years (Table 1). The modal number of days in the hospital was 4-6 and 1.5% left against medical advice. The most common primary diagnosis was major depression (53.7%), followed by bipolar disorder (22.3%), and least common was PTSD (0.9%), co-morbid eating disorders (1%), and disruptive disorders (1%). A self-harm, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt was coded on 56.9% of hospitalizations [most common in major depressive disorder admissions (71.4%, n=36,448); least common in co-morbid eating disorder admissions (11.7%, n=116)].

Table 1.

Individual-level characteristics and acute mental health service use for mental health, 2013-2018


Inpatient hospitalization (n = 95,153) Emergency Department Use (n = 108,576)

N % N %

Age, years
 12-17 39,337 41.3 37,393 34.4
 18-27 55,816 58.7 71,183 65.6
Female 53,453 56.2 62,857 57.9
Health plan type
 Basic/ major medical/ comprehensive 2,890 3.0 2,721 2.5
 Preferred provider organization 56,296 59.2 62,138 57.2
 High-deductible/consumer-driven 16,221 17.1 20,193 18.6
 All other health plans* 19,746 20.8 23,524 21.7
Pediatric medical complexity
 Non-chronic 58,788 61.8 76,423 70.4
 Non-complex chronic 22,238 23.4 20,947 19.3
 Complex chronic 14,127 14.9 11,206 10.3
Left against medical advice 1,447 1.5 N/A
Length of stay, days
 3 or less 25,728 27.0
 4 to 6 36,879 38.8 N/A
 7 to 10 20,741 21.8
 11 or more 11,805 12.4
Primary reason for admission
 Schizophrenia 4,565 4.8 1,392 1.3
 Bipolar disorder 21,225 22.3 7,322 6.7
 Major depression 51,061 53.7 24,922 23.0
 Anxiety disorders/ Phobias 2,152 2.3 47,826 44.1
 Post-traumatic stress disorder 811 0.9 607 0.6
 Other psychotic disorders 3,326 3.5 2,964 2.7
 Disruptive disorders 950 1.0 4,040 3.7
 Substance-use related (co-morbid)** 8,946 9.4 8,309 7.7
 Eating disorders (co-morbid)** 992 1.0 153 0.1
Self-harm/ suicide-related event*** 54,105 56.9 27,652 25.5
Established outpatient healthcare engagement
 Primary care and mental health care 31,811 33.4 28,036 25.8
 Mental health care only 27,775 29.2 22,396 25.8
 Primary care only 13,906 14.6 24,279 20.6
 None 21,661 22.8 33,865 31.2
Mental health care follow-up
 Within 7 days 40,619 42.7 31,033 28.6
 Within 30 days 64,148 64.7 50,402 46.4
*

All other health plans include: exclusive provider organization, health maintenance organization, point-of-service.

**

Patients were included in this group if the primary diagnosis code for the acute event was for either substance-use or eating disorders (respectively) and they had a code for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, anxiety disorders/phobias, post-traumatic stress disorder, other psychotic disorders, or disruptive disorders in any of the remaining diagnosis codes. (See Supplemental Table S2 for details).

***

Patients were classified as having a self-harm or suicide-related event if any diagnosis codes on the acute event were coded (regardless of the mental health conditions above). For this reason, primary reason for admission does not add up to 100%. (See Supplemental Table S2 for details).

About one third had both primary and mental health care use before hospitalization, while 22.8% had no established outpatient care (Table 1). Established care was most common in those with co-morbid eating disorders and least common in those with psychotic disorders (Tables S6S7). Those of younger age, female, and with complex, chronic conditions had a higher prevalence of established outpatient care.

Mental health follow-up occurred in 42.7% within 7 days and 64.7% within 30 days (Table 1). The strongest predictor of mental health follow-up was established outpatient engagement in the 6 months prior, with type of established care impacting odds of follow-up (Table 2). Compared to those with no established outpatient care, those with both primary care and mental health care had the highest odds of follow-up (within 7-days: aOR=2.81, 95% CI=2.68-2.94). Those with only mental health care had 2.57 the odds (95% CI=2.45-2.70) of receiving mental health follow-up within 7 days of discharge. Those with only primary care had the lowest odds of follow-up as compared to other types of established outpatient care (within 7-days: aOR=1.20, 95% CI=1.15-1.26). Similar patterns were observed in 30-day follow up.

Table 2.

Factors associated with mental health follow-up after hospitalization for mental health, 2013-2018


7 days 30 days

follow-up (%) aOR 95% CI follow-up (%) aOR 95% CI

Established outpatient healthcare engagement
 Primary care and mental health care 53.0 2.81 2.68-2.94 79.2 3.76 3.51-4.03
 Mental health care only 49.4 2.57 2.45-2.70 75.4 3.25 3.06-3.46
 Primary care only 31.3 1.20 1.15-1.26 55.5 1.29 1.22-1.35
 None 26.3 Ref 47.5 Ref
Age, years
 12-17 49.2 1.24 1.20-1.29 75.7 1.42 1.34-1.51
 18-27 38.1 Ref 61.6 Ref
Sex
 Male 38.6 Ref 62.8 Ref
 Female 45.9 1.14 1.11-1.16 71.0 1.16 1.13-1.20
Plan type
 Basic/ major medical/ comprehensive 37.0 0.83 0.65-1.06 58.9 0.73 0.53-1.00
 Preferred provider organization 43.0 1.07 0.93-1.23 67.8 1.07 0.91-1.27
 High-deductible/consumer-driven 43.7 1.08 0.95-1.22 69.1 1.08 0.94-1.24
 All other health plans* 41.7 Ref 66.2 Ref
Pediatric medical complexity
 Non-chronic 42.0 Ref 67.0 Ref
 Non-complex chronic 43.9 1.01 0.98-1.05 68.5 0.98 0.94-1.02
 Complex chronic 43.7 1.01 0.97-1.05 67.5 0.94 0.90-0.98
Length of stay, days
 3 or less 37.7 Ref 62.1 Ref
 4 to 6 44.4 1.21 1.15-1.28 69.8 1.25 1.20-1.30
 7 to 10 46.2 1.28 1.21-1.35 71.1 1.30 1.22-1.39
 11 or more 41.8 1.13 1.06-1.22 65.0 1.11 1.04-1.19
Left against medical advice
 No 42.8 Ref 67.6 Ref
 Yes 33.7 0.94 0.83-1.06 52.6 0.78 0.69-0.88
Primary reason for admission
 Schizophrenia 38.6 0.83 0.75-0.92 63.1 0.83 0.75-0.91
 Bipolar disorder 42.9 0.85 0.81-0.88 68.2 0.81 0.78-0.85
 Major depression 46.5 Ref 72.3 Ref
 Anxiety disorders/ Phobias 45.8 0.95 0.88-1.02 69.8 0.85 0.78-0.93
 Post-traumatic stress disorder 41.8 0.74 0.68-0.81 67.0 0.67 0.58-0.77
 Other psychotic disorders 38.9 0.93 0.86-1.01 64.9 1.02 0.94-1.11
 Disruptive disorders 34.5 0.58 0.50-0.68 61.2 0.55 0.47-0.64
 Substance-use related (co-morbid)** 23.7 0.46 0.41-0.51 41.0 0.37 0.34-0.39
 Eating disorders (co-morbid)** 52.4 0.99 0.87-1.13 73.0 0.76 0.62-0.92
Self-harm/ suicide-related***
 No 39.7 Ref 63.3 Ref
 Yes 44.9 1.03 1.04-1.12 70.6 1.11 1.06-1.16

*

All other health plans include: exclusive provider organization, health maintenance organization, point-of-service

**

Patients were included in this group if the primary diagnosis code for the acute event was for either substance-use or eating disorders (respectively) and they had a code for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, anxiety disorders/phobias, post-traumatic stress disorder, other psychotic disorders, or disruptive disorders in any of the remaining diagnosis codes. (See Supplemental Table S2 for details).

***

Patients were classified as having a self-harm or suicide-related event if any diagnosis codes on the acute event were coded (regardless of the mental health conditions above (See Supplemental Table S2 for details).

In most age groups, each type of established outpatient care predicted mental health follow-up within 7 days (Table S10). Established outpatient including mental health (with or without primary care) predicted mental health follow-up regardless of primary diagnosis code (Table S12).

Older age and leaving against medical advice were associated with decreased odds of mental health follow-up (Table 2). Female sex, hospitalizations related to self-harm/suicide, and longer length of stay was associated with increased odds of mental health follow-up. Compared to those hospitalized for major depression, those hospitalized for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, PTSD, disruptive disorders, and co-morbid substance use disorder had decreased odds of mental health follow-up within 7 days or 30 days. The primary reasons for hospitalization associated with mental health follow-up within 7 days differed slightly by age group (Table S10). Of those hospitalized for substance-use disorder, 23.7% (n=2,124) received follow-up within 7 days, and 41.0% (n=3,668) within 30 days. Of those with co-morbid substance use disorder as the primary reason for hospitalization, 43.2% (n=3,780) had substance-use specific follow-up (not included in the outpatient mental healthcare definition explored) within 7-days and 54.6% (n=4,780) within 30 days.

Emergency room visits

Of those who used the emergency room for mental health the average age was 19.5 years. The majority were female (57.9%), had a preferred provider organization plan type (57.2%), and had no chronic health conditions other than mental illness (70.4%) (Table 1). The primary diagnosis code was anxiety/phobias (44.1%) and major depression (23.0%). One in four visits carried a code for self-harm, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt [most common in major depressive disorder (34.7%, n=8,645); least common in anxiety disorders (3.7%, n=1,750)]. Nearly one third lacked established outpatient care before emergency room use. Mental health follow-up was observed in 28.6% within 7 days and 46.4% within 30 days. Any follow-up increased this to 34.1% within 7 days and 55.5% within 30 days (Table S8).

The strongest predictor of mental health follow-up was established outpatient engagement (Table 3). Compared to those with no established outpatient care, those with both primary care and mental health care had the highest odds of follow-up (within 7-days: aOR=4.06, 95% CI=3.72-4.42). Those with mental health care had 3.48 the odds (95% CI=3.17-3.82) of follow-up within 7 days, after adjusting for all other covariates. Those with primary care had the lowest odds of follow-up as compared to other types of established outpatient care (within 7-days: aOR=1.22, 95% CI=1.16-1.28).

Table 3.

Factors associated with mental health follow-up after emergency room use for mental health, 2013-2018


7 days 30 days

follow-up (%) aOR 95% CI follow-up (%) aOR 95% CI

Established outpatient healthcare engagement
 Primary care and mental health care 44.9 4.06 3.72-4.42 69.2 5.47 5.10-5.87
 Mental health care only 39.9 3.48 3.17-3.82 63.8 4.53 4.16-4.93
 Primary care only 18.5 1.22 1.16-1.28 32.4 1.26 1.21-1.31
 None 14.8 Ref 26.2 Ref
Age, years
 12-17 36.9 1.42 1.34-1.50 57.0 1.43 1.36-1.51
 18-27 24.2 Ref 40.9 Ref
Sex
 Male 27.0 Ref 44.5 Ref
 Female 29.7 1.00 0.97-1.03 47.8 1.00 0.97-1.03
Plan type
 Basic/ major medical/ comprehensive 26.6 0.96 0.81-1.15 43.6 0.90 0.74-1.09
 Preferred provider organization 29.0 1.07 0.95-1.21 46.8 1.06 0.93-1.20
 High-deductible/consumer-driven 28.8 1.05 0.95-1.15 46.8 1.06 0.95-1.16
 All other health plans* 27.5 Ref 45.3 Ref
Pediatric medical complexity
 Non-chronic 27.8 Ref 45.2 Ref
 Non-complex chronic 30.2 1.01 0.98-1.04 48.7 1.02 0.98-1.05
 Complex chronic 30.7 0.98 0.94-1.02 50.3 1.00 0.96-1.05
Primary reason for admission
 Schizophrenia 26.4 0.90 0.75-1.08 47.1 1.02 0.85-1.22
 Bipolar disorder 33.0 1.03 0.93-1.14 55.6 1.22 1.12-1.34
 Major depression 37.8 1.35 1.28-1.42 59.0 1.52 1.46-1.59
 Anxiety disorders/ Phobias 24.2 Ref 39.4 Ref
 Post-traumatic stress disorder 39.7 1.42 1.13-1.78 56.5 1.30 1.12-1.51
 Other psychotic disorders 22.6 0.89 0.79-1.00 41.1 1.05 0.93-1.17
 Disruptive disorders 30.5 0.83 0.77-0.90 50.8 0.91 0.82-1.01
 Substance-use related (co-morbid)** 18.9 0.62 0.59-0.66 33.8 0.62 0.59-0.66
 Eating disorders (co-morbid)** 45.1 1.37 1.05-1.78 66.0 1.38 0.97-1.95
Self-harm/ suicide-related***
 No 26.6 Ref 43.6 Ref
 Yes 34.3 1.20 1.12-1.27 54.6 1.29 1.23-1.36

*

All other health plans include: exclusive provider organization, health maintenance organization, point-of-service

**

Patients were included in this group if the primary diagnosis code for the acute event was for either substance-use or eating disorders (respectively) and they had a code for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, anxiety disorders/phobias, post-traumatic stress disorder, other psychotic disorders, or disruptive disorders in any of the remaining diagnosis codes. (See Supplemental Table S2 for details).

***

Patients were classified as having a self-harm or suicide-related event if any diagnosis codes on the acute event were coded (regardless of the mental health conditions above). (See Supplemental Table S2 for details).

In most age groups, each type of established outpatient care predicted mental health follow-up within 7 days (Table S11). Established outpatient including mental health (with or without primary care) predicted mental health follow-up regardless of primary diagnosis code (Table S13). Older age was associated with decreased odds of mental health follow-up, while use related to self-harm/suicide was associated with increased odds (Table 3).

Compared to emergency room use for anxiety disorders/ phobias, increased odds of follow-up were observed in major depression, PTSD, and bipolar disorder (30 days only); those utilizing the emergency room for disruptive disorders (7 days only) and co-morbid substance use had decreased odds. The primary reasons for hospitalization associated with mental health follow-up within 7 days differed slightly by age group (Table S11). Of those with emergency room visits for substance-use, 18.9% (n=1,574) had mental health follow-up within 7 days (33.8%, n=2,804 within 30 days). For those with co-morbid substance use as the primary reason for emergency room use, 11.5% (n=957) had substance-use specific follow-up with 7-days, and 17.9% (n=1,485) within 30 days.

Discussion

Over 50% of youth and young adults privately insured lacked mental health follow-up within 7 days of a hospitalization or emergency room use for mental health. Established outpatient care was the strongest predictor of follow-up. Those exhibiting self-harm/suicide had higher odds of follow-up, yet over 50% did not receive follow-up within 7 days of acute service use. Rates of follow-up (mental health and substance-use specific) were notably low in those with co-morbid substance use disorder.

Our findings are consistent with previous research indicating that having established care increases odds of follow-up after acute service use.12 To our knowledge, we are the first to show that type of established care impacts rates of follow-up. Youth and young adults with both primary care and mental health care had the highest odds of follow-up. These results highlight that establishing patients with both primary care and mental healthcare is essential to improving follow-up after acute mental healthcare use. Given the well-documented shortage of mental health professionals,20 primary care has become the de-facto mental health care system.21 Our study suggests that primary care, when functioning alone in the current health system, might be less able to connect youth and young adults with mental health conditions to recommended specialty care in a timely manner. Improving rates of follow-up after acute service use for mental health is one of many reasons to support national efforts to integrate primary and mental health care.2225 Additionally, increased access to Coordinated Specialty Care would likely be beneficial for many of these youth, especially those experiencing first episode psychosis.26 This is a team-based, recovery-oriented intervention demonstrated to decrease hospitalization rates and increase education and employment rates.27

Alarming suicide trends in youth are well documented28,29 and exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.30,31 Suicide risk is significantly increased after emergency room use or hospitalization.32 In several studies, follow-up care after acute service use for suicide attempt has been associated with lower risk of suicide re-attempt and suicide death, making this particularly important in those exhibiting symptoms of self-harm, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt.10,33 The majority of hospitalizations were suicide-related, yet 55.1% of those exhibiting suicide-related symptoms did not receive follow-up after discharge. Emergency room use related to suicide was relatively low, likely because emergency room visits resulting in a hospitalization were included in the inpatient sample. This may have produced an emergency room sample that disproportionately included those with anxiety/phobias, which had the lowest prevalence of suicide-related symptoms. Given these considerations, the 65.7% who did not receive follow-up within 7 days of emergency room use related to suicide represent a major gap in care. Efforts such as the Zero Suicide Initiative aim to prevent suicide for those under the care of health systems.34 An effort to improve transitions in care through increased follow-up after acute service use could target suicide prevention in high-risk youth, potentially by requiring follow-up appointments at hospital discharge for those with suicide risk factors. Additionally, the potentially iatrogenic effects of inpatient psychiatric care emphasize the need to prevent hospitalization entirely,35 potentially via national efforts such as The 988 Hotline to provide specialized care during mental health crisis.36

About one third of those who used the emergency room for mental health condition lacked established outpatient care and less than 50% received mental health follow-up within 30 days of discharge. Low rates of outpatient healthcare utilization are well-documented in the young adult population.3739 Given patients in our study were privately insured and had a documented mental health diagnosis, these low rates are concerning. Emergency room care is typically less comprehensive and shorter than inpatient hospitalizations, providing less opportunity to set up follow-up care. This could be improved by increasing utilization of case management40 and requiring a follow-up appointment at discharge. Of all mental health conditions explored, those with co-morbid substance use as the primary reason for emergency room use had the lowest rates of follow-up care (overall and substance-use specific). Recent efforts have focused on follow-up care for adults with co-morbid substance use disorder, given the high rates of hospital re-admission and post-discharge mortality in this population.41 With the rising rates of substance-use related deaths42 and youth-related concerns,43 these trends require more detailed research.

Study limitations include identification of mental health being limited to diagnostic codes as no information regarding functional status was available. The validity of administrative claims data and diagnostic codes in identifying mental health diagnoses is documented.16,44 We lacked racial/ethnic information and other social determinants. Mental health care may be received in settings not included in this data, such as schools or out-of-network spending. Nevertheless, this study is the first to examine the associations between established outpatient care and follow-up rates after acute mental health care in privately insured youth.

Conclusions

In conclusion, these findings underscore the importance of increasing rates of established outpatient mental health and primary care to improve follow-up rates after acute service use for mental health among youth and young adults. Integration of primary and mental health care may help achieve optimal follow-up rates. In emergency room settings, special attention should be given to those with co-morbid substance use and those exhibiting signs of self-harm or suicide.

Supplementary Material

supplement

Highlights:

  • Of youth and young adults who visited the emergency room for mental health, 28.6% received follow-up within 7-days and 46.4% within 30-days.

  • Follow-up within 7 days of discharge from a hospitalization for mental health was observed in 42.7% of youth and young adults (64.7% within 30 days).

  • The strongest predictor of follow-up was having established both primary care and mental healthcare in the 6 months prior to acute service use.

  • Follow-up rates were notably low in those with co-morbid substance use disorder.

Acknowledgments:

A special thanks to the stakeholders involved: the Young Adult Advisory Board from the Implementation Science & Practice Advances Research Center at UMass Chan Medical School, The National Federation of Families, Got Transition® (from the National Alliance to Advance Adolescent Health), Mental Health America, Commonwealth Medicine, and Reliant Medical Group. This research was supported by the National Institutes of General Medical Sciences Medical Scientist Training Program (T32GM107000), and the National Center for Advancing Translational Science TL1 Training Grant, National Institutes of Health (TR001454).

Footnotes

Presentation information: An abstract reporting this work was accepted to the 2022 American Psychiatric Association annual meeting.

Disclosures: Ms. Hugunin, Dr. Davis, Dr. Larkin, Dr. Baek, Dr. Skehan, and Dr. Lapane report no financial relationships with commercial interests and have no conflicts relevant to this research.

Contributor Information

Julie Hugunin, Clinical and Population Health Research PhD Program, Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.

Maryann Davis, Clinical and Population Health Research PhD Program, Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester; Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.

Celine Larkin, Clinical and Population Health Research PhD Program, Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester; Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.

Jonggyu Baek, Clinical and Population Health Research PhD Program, Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.

Brain Skehan, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester; Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.

Kate L. Lapane, Clinical and Population Health Research PhD Program, Morningside Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester.

References

  • 1.The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory: Protecting Youth Mental Health. 2021. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-youth-mental-health-advisory.pdf. Accessed December 9, 2021.
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey — United States, January–June 2021. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(3). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-. Accessed April 1, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jones SE, Ethier KA, Hertz M, et al. Mental Health, Suicidality, and Connectedness Among High School Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic — Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey, United States, January–June 2021. MMWR Suppl. 2022;71(3):16–21. doi: 10.15585/MMWR.SU7103A3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Torio C, Encinosa W, Berdahl T, McCormick M, Simpson L. Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: national estimates of cost, utilization and expenditures for children with mental health conditions. Acad Pediatr. 2015;15(1):19–35. doi: 10.1016/J.ACAP.2014.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Owens PL, McDermott KW, Lipari RN, Hambrick MM. Emergency Department Visits Related to Suicidal Ideation or Suicide Attempt, 2008-2017 #263.; 2020. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb263-Suicide-ED-Visits-2008-2017.jsp. Accessed October 15, 2021. [PubMed]
  • 6.Heslin KC, Elixhauser A. Mental and Substance Use Disorders Among Hospitalized Teenagers, 2012. Natl Inpatient Sample. 2016:2012. http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/2013MHDetTabs/NSDUH-. Accessed August 13, 2021. [PubMed]
  • 7.Santillanes G, Axeen S, Lam C, Menchine M. National trends in mental health-related emergency department visits by children and adults, 2009-2015. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(12):2536–2544. doi: 10.1016/J.AJEM.2019.12.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brown J, Scholle SH, Croake S, et al. Development and Testing of Behavioral Health Quality Measures for Health Plans: Final Report.; 2015. https://aspe.hhs.gov/office-disability-. Accessed August 31, 2021.
  • 9.National Committee for Quality Assurance. Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set: Effectiveness of Care Behavioral Health Measures. 2021. https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/. Accessed August 31, 2021.
  • 10.Fontanella CA, Warner LA, Steelesmith DL, Brock G, Bridge JA, Campo JV. Association of Timely Outpatient Mental Health Services for Youths After Psychiatric Hospitalization With Risk of Death by Suicide. JAMA Netw open. 2020;3(8):e2012887. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Beadles CA, Ellis AR, Lichstein JC, et al. First outpatient follow-up after psychiatric hospitalization: Does one size fit all? Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(4):364–372. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marino L, Wissow LS, Davis M, Abrams MT, Dixon LB, Slade EP. Predictors of outpatient mental health clinic follow-up after hospitalization among Medicaid-enrolled young adults. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016;10(6):468–475. doi: 10.1111/eip.12206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.United States Government Accountability Office: Report to Congressional Requesters: Young Adults With Serious Mental Illness: Some States and Federal Agencies Are Taking Steps to Address Their Transition Challenges. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Skehan B, Davis M. Aligning Mental Health Treatments with the Developmental Stage and Needs of Late Adolescents and Young Adults. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2017;26(2):177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2016.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Soe K, Babajide A, Gibbs T. APA Official Actions Position Statement on Transitional Aged Youth. American Psychiatric Association. https://www.psychiatry.org/FileLibrary/About-APA/Organization-Documents-Policies/Policies/Position-Transitional-Aged-Youth.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed August 31, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.IBM Watson Health. IBM MarketScan Research Databases for Health Services Researchers. White Pap. 2019:15. https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/6KNYVVQ2. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Voss E, Ma Q, Ryan P. The impact of standardizing the definition of visits on the consistency of multi-database observational health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1). doi: 10.1186/S12874-015-0001-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.American Academy of Family Physicians: Primary Care Definition. 2021. https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/primary-care.html. Accessed May 6, 2021.
  • 19.Simon TD, Haaland W, Hawley K, Lambka K, Mangione-Smith R. Development and Validation of the Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm (PMCA) Version 3.0. Acad Pediatr. 2018;18(5):557–580. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.02.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration: Behavioral Health Workforce Report. 2021. https://annapoliscoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/behavioral-health-workforce-report-SAMHSA-2.pdf. Accessed December 9, 2021.
  • 21.Kessler R, Stafford D. Primary Care Is the De Facto Mental Health System. In: Collaborative Medicine Case Studies: Evidence in Practice. Springer, New York, NY; 2008:9–21. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-76894-6_2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Butler M, Robert Kane ML, McAlpine D, et al. Integration of Mental Health/Substance Abuse and Primary Care: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, No. 173 (Prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0009). AHRQ Publication No.09-E003. Rockville, MD; 2008. www.ahrq.gov. Accessed May 6, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wissow LS, Ginneken N van, Chandna J, Rahman A. Integrating children’s mental health into primary care. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016;63(1):97–113. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2015.08.005.Integrating [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Croghan TW, Brown JD. Integrating Mental Health Treatment Into the Patient Centered Medical Home. (Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research under Contract No. HHSA290200900019I TO2.) AHRQ Publication No. 10-0084-EF. Rockville, MD; 2010. www.ahrq.gov. Accessed May 6, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hua LL, Alderman EM, Chung RJ, et al. Collaborative care in the identification and management of psychosis in adolescents and young adults. Pediatrics. 2021;147(6). doi: 10.1542/PEDS.2021-051486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Heinssen RK, Goldstein AB, Azrin ST. Evidence-Based Treatments for First Episode Psychosis: Components of Coordinated Specialty Care.; 2014. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/schizophrenia/raise/evidence-based-treatments-for-first-episode-psychosis-components-of-coordinated-specialty-care. Accessed January 20, 2022.
  • 27.Nossel I, Wall MM, Scodes J, et al. Results of a Coordinated Specialty Care Program for Early Psychosis and Predictors of Outcomes. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(8):863–870. doi: 10.1176/APPI.PS.201700436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Curtin SC. State Suicide Rates among Adolescents and Young Adults Aged 10–24: United States, 2000–2018. Vol 69. Hyattsville, MD; 2020. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/93667. Accessed December 9, 2021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Data Summary & Trends Report: 2009-2019. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/dear_colleague/2020/dcl-102320-YRBS-2009-2019-report.html.
  • 30.Racine N, McArthur BA, Cooke JE, Eirich R, Zhu J, Madigan S. Global Prevalence of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Children and Adolescents During COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(11):1142–1150. doi: 10.1001/JAMAPEDIATRICS.2021.2482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yard E, Radhakrishnan L, Ballesteros MF, et al. Emergency Department Visits for Suspected Suicide Attempts Among Persons Aged 12–25 Years Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, January 2019–May 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(24):888–894. doi: 10.15585/MMWR.MM7024E1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ahmedani BK, Westphal J, Autio K, et al. Variation in patterns of health care before suicide: A population case-control study. Prev Med (Baltim). 2019;127. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ghanbari B, Malakouti SK, Nojomi M, Alavi K, Khaleghparast S. Suicide Prevention and Follow-Up Services: A Narrative Review. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;8(5):145. doi: 10.5539/GJHS.V8N5P145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stapelberg NJC, Sveticic J, Hughes I, et al. Efficacy of the Zero Suicide framework in reducing recurrent suicide attempts: cross-sectional and time-to-recurrent-event analyses. Br J Psychiatry. 2021;219(2):427–436. doi: 10.1192/BJP.2020.190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ward-Ciesielski EF, Rizvi SL. The potential iatrogenic effects of psychiatric hospitalization for suicidal behavior: A critical review and recommendations for research. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2020:e12332. doi: 10.1111/CPSP.12332 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Krass P, Dalton E, Candon M, Doupnik S. Implementing The 988 Hotline: A Critical Window To Decriminalize Mental Health . Health Aff 2022. 10.1377/forefront.20220223.476040. Accessed March 31, 2022. [DOI]
  • 37.Kessler RC, Demler O, Frank RG, et al. Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2515–2523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa043266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Copeland WE, Shanahan L, Davis M, Burns BJ, Angold A, Costello EJ. Increase in untreated cases of psychiatric disorders during the transition to adulthood. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(4):397–403. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lau JS, Adams SH, Irwin CE, Ozer EM. Receipt of preventive health services in young adults. J Adolesc Heal. 2013;52(1):42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Turner SB, Stanton MP. Psychiatric Case Management in the Emergency Department. Prof Case Manag. 2015;20(5):217–227. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gryczynski J, Nordeck CD, Welsh C, Mitchell SG, O KE, Schwartz RP. Preventing Hospital Readmission for Patients With Comorbid Substance Use Disorder A Randomized Trial Background: Hospitalized patients with comorbid substance. 2021. doi: 10.7326/M20-5475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.National Center for Health Statistics: Drug Overdose Deaths in the U.S. Top 100,000 Annually. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2021/20211117.htm. Accessed December 9, 2021.
  • 43.Levy S Youth and the opioid epidemic. Pediatrics. 2019;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nesvåg R, Jönsson EG, Bakken IJ, et al. The quality of severe mental disorder diagnoses in a national health registry as compared to research diagnoses based on structured interview. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1256-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES