Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Oct 31;81(1):16–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.008

Table 2.

GRADE Assessment

Certainty assessment No of patients Effect Certainty Importance
No of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other consideration DOACs VKAs Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Composite of arterial thrombotic events
4 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious Very strong association 24/234
(10.3%)
3/238
(1.3%)
OR 5.43
(1.87 to 15.75)
5 more per 100
(from 1 more to 15 more)
⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
CRITICAL
Venous thromboembolic events
4 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousa None 4/234
(1.7%)
3/238
(1.3%)
OR 1.20
(0.31 to 4.55)
0 fewer per 100
(from 1 fewer to 4 more)
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
IMPORTANT
Major bleeding
4 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousa None 10/234
(4.3%)
10/238
(4.2%)
OR 1.02
(0.42 to 2.47)
0 fewer per 100
(from 2 fewer to 6 more)
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
IMPORTANT

Factors contributing to the certainty of evidence include the risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, publication bias, and the strength of association. CI = confidence interval; DOACs = direct oral anticoagulants; GRADE = Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation; OR = odds ratio; VKAs = vitamin-K antagonists.

Explanations

a.

Low event rate and wide CI with no clear harm or benefit with the use of direct oral anticoagulants.