Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 13;39(1):221–231. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02703-y

Table 3.

The agreement between patient risk classification based on FBP and risk classification based on MBIR, HIR, and DLR respectively

Risk classification based on FBP
0 1 2 3 4
Risk classification based on MBIR
 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 (20%)
 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 (4%)
 2 0 1 16 0 0 17 (34%)
 3 0 0 1 7 0 8 (16%)
 4 0 0 0 0 13 13 (26%)
11(22%) 2(4%) 17(34%) 7(14%) 13(26%) 50
Risk classification based on HIR
 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 (22%)
 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 (2%)
 2 0 1 17 0 0 18 (36%)
 3 0 0 0 7 1 8 (16%)
 4 0 0 0 0 12 12 (24%)
11(22%) 2(4%) 17(34%) 7(14%) 13(26%) 50
Risk classification based on DLR
 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 (22%)
 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 (2%)
 2 0 1 17 0 0 18 (36%)
 3 0 0 0 7 1 8 (16%)
 4 0 0 0 0 12 12 (24%)
11(22%) 2(4%) 17(34%) 7(14%) 13(26%) 50

Risk groups are defined as follows: 0 Agatston score—0; 0.1 to 10 Agatston score—1; 10.1 to 100 Agatston score—2; 100.1 to 400 Agatston score—3; > 400 Agatston score—4