Table 10.
Predictor | ΔR2 | β |
---|---|---|
Model 1: Predicting frequency of CS during English conversations at 2;6 | ||
Step 1 | .58*** | |
Degree of English dominance | −.76*** | |
Step 2 | .05 | |
Degree of English dominance | −1.02*** | |
English EOWPVT | 0.33 | |
Total R2 | .63*** | |
Model 2: Predicting frequency of CS during English conversations at 3;6 | ||
Step 1 | .30*** | |
Degree of English dominance | −.55*** | |
Step 2 | .003 | |
Degree of English dominance | −.49* | |
English EOWPVT | −.08 | |
Total R2 | .30** | |
Model 3: Predicting frequency of CS during Spanish conversations at 2;6 | ||
Step 1 | .54*** | |
Degree of English dominance | .73*** | |
Step 2 | .001 | |
Degree of English dominance | .76*** | |
Spanish EOWPVT | .03 | |
Total R2 | .54*** | |
Model 4: Predicting frequency of CS during Spanish conversations at 3;6 | ||
Step 1 | .66*** | |
Degree of English dominance | .81*** | |
Step 2 | .032 | |
Degree of English dominance | .62*** | |
Spanish EOWPVT | −.26 | |
Total R2 | .69*** |
Note. CS = code-switching.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001