Skip to main content
editorial
. 2023 Jan 3;8(1):100749. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100749

Table 2.

Alternative dosing regimens of anticancer drugs and recommendations for their implementation

Drug Approved dosing regimen Alternative dosing regimen Available evidence Translated into drug label Author’s recommendation Reference
Alternative dosing leading to equivalent exposure
Abiraterone 1000 mg fasted 250 mg fed Exposure below bioequivalence margins + equivalent PSA change No Establish no-effect boundaries in exposure–response analysis + equivalent exposure 14
Atezolizumab 1200 mg Q3W 1680 mg Q4W
840 mg Q2W
Equivalent exposure and safety based on modeling Yes Implement in label agreement 15
Ceritinib 750 mg fasted 450 mg fed Equivalent exposure and improved safety16
Consistent efficacy17
Yes Implement in label agreement 16,17
Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 Q1W 500 mg/m2 Q2W Non-inferior efficacy No Implement in clinical practice 9
Erlotinib 150 mg QD 75 mg + ritonavir 200 mg QD Comparable exposure in a single-dose PK study No Equivalent exposure needs to be demonstrated before implementation 18
Ibrutinib 140 mg QD 15 mg + itraconazole 200 mg QD Comparable exposure in a single-dose PK study No Equivalent exposure needs to be demonstrated before implementation 19
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W 240 mg Q2W Equivalent exposure based on modeling Yes Implement in label agreement 20
Nivolumab 240 mg Q2W 480 mg Q4W Equivalent exposure based on modeling Yes Implement in label agreement 21
Pazopanib 800 mg fasted 600 mg fed Equivalent exposure No Implement in clinical practice 5
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg Q3W 200 mg Q3W Equivalent exposure based on modeling Yes Implement in label agreement 22
Pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W 400 mg Q6W Equivalent exposure based on modeling Yes Implement in label agreement 23
Sunitinib 50 mg 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off 50 mg 2 weeks on, 1 week off Equivalent efficacy and improved safety No Implement in clinical practice 24
Alternative dosing regimens leading to lower or shorter exposure
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 20 mg/m2 Non-inferior efficacy + improved safety Yes Implement in label agreement 25
Dasatinib 70 mg BID 100 mg QD Non-inferior efficacy Yes Implement in label agreement 26
Dasatinib 100 mg QD 50 mg QD Similar efficacy + improved safety No Non-inferiority on clinical endpoints needs to be demonstrated before implementation 27
Imatinib Until progression Until undetectable BCR-ABL transcript levels Meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies No Implement in clinical practice 7
Trastuzumab 12 months 6 months Non-inferior efficacy No Implement in clinical practice 8
Alternative dosing regimens leading to higher exposure
Imatinib 400 mg QD 400 mg BID for patients with GIST with KIT exon 9 mutation Superior efficacy No Implement in clinical practice 28
Sunitinib 50 mg 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off 700 mg Q2W Clinical trial ongoing No Superiority to standard-of-care needs to be demonstrated before implementation NCT03909724

BID, twice daily; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor; PK, pharmacokinetic; PSA, prostate specific antigen; QD, once daily; Q1W, every week; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q3W, every 3 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q6W, every 6 weeks.