Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 5;34(3):573–584. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06648-9

Table 2.

The associations between subsequent therapy (oral, IV BP) and no subsequent treatment with absolute change (g/cm2) in LS, FN, and TH BMD between last denosumab injection (DXA2) and follow-up (DXA3)

Parameters Treatment Mean absolute change
(95% confidence interval)
p valuea
LS BMD Change (g/cm2)

No treatment (n = 29)

Risedronate (n = 20)

Alendronate (n = 28)

Zoledronic acid (n = 27)

 − 0.041 (− 0.062 to − 0.021)

 − 0.035 (− 0.052 to − 0.017)

 − 0.005 (− 0.020 to 0.009)

 − 0.009 (− 0.025 to 0.008)

Reference

 > 0.999

0.015

0.037

FN BMD change (g/cm2)

No treatment (n = 31)

Risedronate (n = 20)

Alendronate (n = 34)

Zoledronic acid (n = 31)

 − 0.013 (− 0.023 to − 0.003)

 − 0.011 (− 0.029 to 0.006)

0.004 (− 0.007 to 0.014)

0.004 (− 0.006 to 0.013)

Reference

 > 0.999

0.160

0.181

TH BMD change (g/cm2)

No treatment (n = 31)

Risedronate (n = 20)

Alendronate (n = 34)

Zoledronic acid (n = 31)

 − 0.016 (− 0.025 to − 0.007)

 − 0.017 (− 0.027 to − 0.007)

 − 0.006 (− 0.017 to 0.004)

0.001 (− 0.006 to 0.008)

Reference

 > 0.999

0.673

0.034

IV, intravenous; BP, bisphosphonates; BMD, bone mineral density; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; LS, lumbar spine; FN, femoral neck; TH, total hip; ALN, alendronate; ZOL, zoledronic acid

Significant p values are shown in bold

aGroup comparison by analysis of variance (ANOVA): LS (p = 0.004); FN (p = 0.047); TH (p = 0.016). Adjusted p value was calculated from post hoc analysis with the Bonferroni method