Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 5;31:1. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01065-7

Table 3.

Performance of GFAP and PreSS for identification of stroke, ICrH, and LVO

Stroke subtype Sensitivity% (95% CI) Specificity% (95% CI) PPV% (95% CI) NPV% (95% CI) LR+ (95% CI) LR− (95% CI)
GFAP (n = 299)
ICrH 25.0 (11.5–43.4)a 100.0 (98.6–100.0)a 100.0 (63.1–100.0)a 91.8 (88.0–94.6)a 0.75 (0.61–0.92)a
PreSS part 1 (n = 299) Stroke/TIA suspected if PreSS part 1 ≥ 1
 Stroke/TIA 94.4 (89.9–97.3) 17.4 (11.1–25.3) 62.7 (56.6–68.5) 67.7 (48.6–83.3) 1.14 (1.04–1.25) 0.32 (0.16–0.66)
PreSS part 2 (n = 268) LVO suspected if PreSS part 1 ≥ 1 and PreSS part 2 ≥ 2
 LVO 55.6 (35.3–74.5) 77.2 (71.4–82.3) 21.4 (12.5–32.9) 93.9 (89.7–96.8) 2.43 (1.62–3.67) 0.58 (0.38–0.88)
PreSS and GFAP combined (as used in the decision tree)
Step 1 Stroke and TIA (Group 4) 94.4 (89.9–97.3) 17.4 (11.1–25.3) 62.7 (56.6–68.5) 67.7 (48.6–83.3) 1.14 (1.04–1.25) 0.32 (0.16–0.66)
Step 2 ICrH (Group 1) 25.0 (11.5–43.4)a 100.0 (98.6–100.0)a 100.0 (63.1–100.0)a 91.8 (88.0–94.6)a 0.75 (0.61–0.92)a
Step 3 LVO (Group 2) 55.6 (35.3–74.5)a 82.4 (77.3–86.7)a 23.8 (14.0–36.2)a 94.9 (91.3–97.3)a 3.15 (2.06–4.81)a 0.54 (0.35–0.83)a

GFAP glial fibrillary acidic protein, ICrH intracranial hemorrhage, LR+ positive likelihood ratio, LR− negative likelihood ratio, LVO large-vessel occlusion, NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, PreSS Prehospital Stroke Score, TIA transient ischemic attack

aGFAP cutoff set at 5369 pg/mL