Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 22;12:1021625. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021625

Table 2.

The performances of DCNN and endoscopist in internal test set and external test set.

Competitors Sensitivity, % Specificity, % Accuracy, % PPV, % NPV, % DT(s)
(95%CI) (95%CI) (95%CI) (95%CI) (95% Cl)
Internal test set
DCNN 88.08 89.05 88.60 87.64 89.44 0.028s
(85.24-90.44) (86.48-91.19) (86.74-90.22) (84.78-90.04) (86.90-91.54)
JE group 69.54a 85.69 78.12s 81.08 76.13 8.05±0.21a
(66.88-72.07) (83.74-87.45) (75.78-80.30) (78.58-83.35) (73.94-78.20)
SE group 89.57a 90.00 89,73a 88.76 90.73 7.69±0.25a
(87.71-91.17) (88.29-91.48) (86.79-92.08) (86.86-90.42) (89.07-92.16)
External test set
DCNN model 92.08 92.05 92.07 90.2 93.60 0.028s
87.91-94.94 88.40-94.65 89.46-94.08 85.79-93.38 90.17-95.92
JE group 70.42a 82.95 77.40a 76.64 77.92 7.98±0.19a
66.18-74.33 79.73-85.74 74.81-79.79 72.47-80.36 74.54-80.96
SE group 90b 90.23 90.13c 87.98 91.91 7.50±0.23a
86.97-92.39 87.59-92.36 88.20-91.77 84.79-90.58 89.41-93.86

a: P<0.01; b: P=0.02; c: P > 0.05. JE(juniorendoscopists); SE(seniorendoscopists); PPV (positive predictive value); NPV(negative predictive value); DT(diagnostic time).