Table 2.
Results of general analysis on normative cutoffs
Normative cutoffs | Patients (n = 45) | Healthy controls (n = 25) | PPV | NPV | FPR | FNR | ACC | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T + /T– | Sensitivity (95% CI) | T + /T– | Specificity (95% CI) | ||||||
Nasreddine et al. (2005) | |||||||||
< 26 | 42/3 | 0.93 (0.84–0.98) | 14/11 | 0.44 (0.32–0.56) | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.07 | 0.75 |
Conti et al. (2015) | |||||||||
ES0 uL ≤ 17.36 | 9/36 | 0.20 (0.12–0.32) | 0/25 | 1.00 (0.93–1.00) | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.48 |
ES1 uL < 19.50 | 23/22 | 0.51 (0.39–0.63) | 2/23 | 0.92 (0.82–0.97) | 0.92 | 0.51 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 0.66 |
ES2 uL < 21.56 | 31/14 | 0.69 (0.57–0.79) | 5/20 | 0.80 (0.68–0.88) | 0.86 | 0.59 | 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.73 |
ES3 uL < 23.36 | 40/5 | 0.89 (0.79–0.95) | 13/12 | 0.48 (0.36–0.60) | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.11 | 0.74 |
Santangelo et al. (2015) | |||||||||
ES0 uL ≤ 15.50 | 4/41 | 0.09 (0.04–0.19) | 0/25 | 1.00 (0.93–1.00) | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.41 |
ES1 uL < 18.28 | 10/35 | 0.22 (0.13–0.34) | 0/25 | 1.00 (0.93–1.00) | 1.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.50 |
ES2 uL < 20.25 | 17/28 | 0.38 (0.27–0.50) | 1/24 | 0.96 (0.88–0.99) | 0.94 | 0.46 | 0.04 | 0.62 | 0.58 |
ES3 uL < 22.23 | 25/20 | 0.56 (0.43–0.67) | 1/24 | 0.96 (0.88–0.99) | 0.96 | 0.54 | 0.04 | 0.44 | 0.70 |
Aiello et al. (2022) | |||||||||
ES0 uL ≤ 18.58 | 11/34 | 0.24 (0.15–0.36) | 1/24 | 0.96 (0.88–0.99) | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 0.75 | 0.50 |
ES1 uL < 20.69 | 22/23 | 0.49 (0.37–0.61) | 1/24 | 0.96 (0.88–0.99) | 0.96 | 0.51 | 0.04 | 0.51 | 0.66 |
ES2 uL < 22.56 | 33/12 | 0.73 (0.61–0.83) | 7/18 | 0.72 (0.60–0.82) | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.73 |
ES3 uL < 24.52 | 39/6 | 0.87 (0.76–0.93) | 10/15 | 0.60 (0.48–0.71) | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.40 | 0.13 | 0.77 |
ES equivalent score, uL upper limit, T + positive test result, T– negative test result, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, FPR false positive rate, FNR false negative rate, ACC accuracy