Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr;69(4):2416–2427. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2416-2427.2001

TABLE 4.

Comparison of MLST to other typing methods

Straina emm type MLST-ST ET based on MLEE RAPD profile
MGAS166 1 28 1
MGAS307 1 28 1
MGAS302 1 28 15
MGAS283 1 28 25
MGAS2127 1 28 1D
MGAS2110 1 91 1B
MGAS2120 1 92 1C
MGAS2125 1 92 1C
MGAS2109 1 93 1F
MGAS2144 1 93 1F
MGAS2226 1 93 1F
MGAS2123 1 94 1F
MGAS327 2 55 4
MGAS286 2 55 6
MGAS157 3 15 2
MGAS159 3 15 2
MGAS268 3 15 2
MGAS277 3 15 20
MGAS254 5 99 28
MGAS258 5 99 28
MGAS300 18 42 20
1RP232 19 65 45
MGAS330 22 46 23
MGAS339 22 46 23
MGAS275 22 46 24
1RP284 24 70 45
D316 25 54 55
MGAS255 28 52 10
MGAS325 28 52 10
D470 29 65 46
MGAS323 50/62 2 9
MGAS324 50/62 2 9
MGAS264 75 49 18
86-809 75 49 59
MGAS261 77 35 4
MGAS331 77 63 13
MGAS2017 89 77 67
MGAS2018 89 77 67
CT95-120 1 28 1
CT95-111 1 28 1
CT95-131 1 28 1
CT95-132 1 28 1
CT95-180 1 28 1
CT95-133 3 15 2
CT95-145 3 15 3
CT95-204 3 15 4
CT95-117 3 15 5
CT95-119 3 15 5
CT95-186 3 15 8
CT95-200 3 18 5
CT95-155 11 20 19
CT95-126 11 20 19
CT95-154 75 49 21
CT95-171 75 49 22
CT95-159 77 63 15
CT95-176 89 77 15
a

Includes all isolates listed in Table 2 whereby there was more than one representative of a given emm type or ST and either an ET or RAPD profile based on previous reports (17, 22, 29, 30).