Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 6;72(1):121–142. doi: 10.1007/s11089-022-01052-w

Table 3.

Predicting work burnout

Models and Predictors β p Fch Significance of Fch
Model one 9.765  < .001
   Age −.050 .503
   SA .332  < .001
   DA .132 .081
Model two 9.801  < .001
   Age .017 .812
   SA .231 .002
   DA .110 .127
   WFC .224 .012
   FWC .148 .100
Model three 24.509  < .001
   Age .047 .487
   SA .137 .061
   DA .084 .211
   WFC .192 .022
   FWC .084 .317
   MJJS −.360  < .001
Model four 6.604 .011
   Age .066 .324
   SA .040 .621
   DA .095 .151
   WFC .138 .102
   FWC .073 .379
   MJJS −.372  < .001
   DSRC −.207 .011
Model five 4.210 .042
   Age .072 .279
   SA .032 .692
   DA .063 .346
   WFC .154 .066
   FWC .064 .434
   MJJS −.383  < .001
   DSRC −.186 .022
   MJJSxDSRC .135 .042

SA Surface Acting Scale, DA Deep Acting Scale, WFC Work–Family Conflict Scale, FWC Family–Work scale, MJSS Ministerial Job Satisfaction Scale, DSCR Differentiation of Self and Role–Clergy Version Revised