Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 22;13(1):31. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010031

Table 2.

Performance metrics for the proposed integrated model vs. Braden alone based on 50 different experiments.

Training Set
Sensitivity Specificity AUC FPR Detection Prevalence
Proposed Model Optimized SVM 74.06 ± 0.45 77.29 ± 0.15 75.67 ± 0.20 22.71 ± 0.15 24.27 ± 0.15
Braden Scale At
Admission
60.62 ± 3.97 58.11 ± 0.69 59.37 ± 2.17 41.89 ± 0.69 42.82 ± 0.59
Before Discharge 74.01 ± 2.48 58.98 ± 1.36 66.55 ± 1.02 41.02 ± 1.36 42.33 ±1.38
Testing Set
Sensitivity Specificity AUC FPR Detection Prevalence
Proposed Model Optimized SVM 74.29 ± 1.23 77.29 ± 0.37 75.79 ± 0.58 22.71 ± 0.37 24.29 ± 0.35
Braden Scale At
Admission
66.90 ± 6.59 58.95 ± 1.37 62.31 ± 3.13 41.05 ± 1.37 41.96 ± 1.35
Before Discharge 72.71 ± 6.89 62.54 ± 1.12 68.08 ± 3.04 37.46 ± 1.12 38.78 ± 1.12

AUC: Area Under the Curve, FPR: False Positive Rate.