. 2022 Dec 30;13(1):117. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010117

Table 4.

Binomial logistic regression analysis for predicting concordance of lesion location between radiologists’ analysis and pathology results.

Predictor	Estimate ^a	Standard Error	p-Value	Odds Ratio	95% Confidence Interval
Predictor	Estimate ^a	Standard Error	p-Value	Odds Ratio	Lower	Upper
Previous MG influence (E/N)	2.146	0.625	<0.001	8.55	2.51	29.09
Symptoms (E/N)	1.703	0.422	<0.001	5.49	2.40	12.55
MG density (F/D)	1.644	0.622	0.008	5.18	1.53	17.51

Abbreviations: MG, mammography; E/N, ratio of existent to nonexistent reference; F/D, ratio of fatty breast to reference dense breast. ^a Estimates represent log odds of concordance vs. discordance.