Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 30;13(1):117. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010117

Table 6.

Invisible cases in AI and concordant cases only in radiologists’ analysis.

Case No. Age
(Year)
Symptom Radiologists AI
MG Density Lesion Location Lesion
Type
Previous MG Influence Lesion size on MG (cm) AI Score (%) Location by AI
R1 66 none c R Asymmetry - 0.5 8.46 R
R2 38 palpation c R Calcification - 0.4 0.1 L
R3 53 none b L Asymmetry Existence 0.4 1.3 L
R4 53 palpation c L Mass - 3.7 0.85 L
R5 67 pain a L Asymmetry - 1.6 2 L
R6 58 none c L mass Existence 0.7 7.5 L
R7 48 palpation c L asymmetry - 4 0.17 L
R8 40 palpation d R asymmetry - 3.2 0.28 R
R9 44 none d R distortion - 1.5 0.01 R
R10 45 none d R calcification - 1.6 6.53 R
R11 47 none d R calcification Existence 0.5 1.92 L
R12 45 palpation d R mass - 1.5 0.15 R
R13 51 none c R calcification - 0.5 3.5 R
R14 66 none a R mass Existence 0.6 0.01 L
R15 59 none b L other Existence 2.7 0.83 L
R16 66 discharge c L asymmetry Existence 0.7 3.5 L
R17 42 none b L mass - 1 0.68 L
R18 67 none b R asymmetry - 0.7 0.21 R
R19 46 palpation c L mass - 1.5 1.03 L
R20 56 none c L mass Existence 0.8 2.53 R
R21 70 none c L distortion Existence 1 5.27 L
R22 50 palpation c R asymmetry Existence 1 0.13 R
R23 47 none d L calcification - 0.5 6.29 L
R24 78 none c R asymmetry Existence 1 0.08 R
R25 46 none c L distortion Existence 0.8 8.72 L
R26 68 palpation b L distortion Existence 1.5 7.06 L
R27 59 none c R asymmetry Existence 1.4 0.34 L

Abbreviations: AI, Artificial intelligence; MG, mammography; L, left; R, right.