Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 22;11(1):32. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010032

Table 2.

Patient characteristics, and efficacy/safety outcomes of the trials.

Sr. No. Author, Year Sample Size Age (Years) Gender (Female) Severity of AD APOE-ε4 Carriers Efficacy Safety
1 Lowe (2), 2021 N = 63; Donanemab, n = 51; placebo, n = 12 69.7 ± 16.4 years 33 (52.4%) MCI/Mild: 40/51 (78.4%) patients who received Donanemab and 9/12 (75%) patients who received placebo; moderate: 5/51 (9.8%) patients who received Donanemab and 3/12 (25%) who received placebo NR Donanemab was well-tolerated up to 10 mg/kg; Single-dose administration from 0.1 to 3.0 mg/kg yielded a mean terminal elimination half-life of ~ 4 days and this increased to ~ 10 days at 10 mg/kg; only 10-mg/kg dosage showed changes in amyloid PET, with a mean SUVR change of −0.26 (SD: −0.26) and mean CL change of −44.4 (SD: 14.2); around 90% of subjects developed anti-drug antibodies at 3 months after a single dose No deaths or drug-related serious adverse events were reported; 6 of 37 patients (16.2%) who received IV Donanemab had mild-to-moderate infusion reactions; two patients (3.9%) in the intervention arms had asymptomatic ARIA-microhemorrhage; four participants (6.4%) across the entire cohort had serious adverse events not related to study drug, including hip fracture, cervical vertebral fracture, urinary tract infection, and noncardiac chest pain
2 Lowe, 2021 N = 61; Donanemab, n = 46; placebo, n = 15 73.2 ± 8.1 years 34 (55.7%) Mean (SD) MMSE score: 21.1 (4.0) 47/61 (77.0%) patients; 11 homozygotes and 36 heterozygotes Amyloid PET mean changes: at 24 weeks, from baseline for single doses were: −16.5 CL (SE = 11.22) with 10 mg/kg, −40.0 CL (SE = 11.23) with 20 mg/kg, and −49.6 CL (SE = 15.10) with 40 mg/kg; at 24 weeks, multiple dosage cohorts had −55.8 CL (SE = 9.51) with 10 mg/kg Q2w *, −50.2 CL (SE = 10.54) with 10 mg/kg Q4w, and −58.4 CL (SE = 9.66) with 20 mg/kg Q4w **; complete amyloid clearance (threshold of below 24.2 CL) established in 11 of 46 (23.9%) patients (one patient in the 20/mg single dose, one patient in the 40 mg/kg single dose, two patients in 10 mg/kg Q2w, two patients in 10 mg/kg Q4w, and five patients in 20 mg/kg Q4w); 45 out of 46 patients had positive TE-ADA with Donanemab Seven serious adverse events in six patients (9.8%) were reported across the entire cohort (one patient died due to non-treatmen-related myocardial infarction, one had intermittent symptomatic cerebral edema (ARIA-E), and four patients had non-treatment-related events; 12 of 46 intervened patients (26.1%) developed vasogenic edema (ARIA-E) in all dosing regimens but the 10 mg/kg single-dose arm; 10 of 46 patients (21.7%) had microhemorrhage events (ARIA-H) across all dosing arms; 2 of 46 (4.4%) patients had superficial siderosis (ARIA-H) in the 10 and 20 mg/kg Q4w arms; 2 of 46 patients (4.4%) in the 20 mg/kg Q4w arm discontinued Donanemab due to TRAE
3 Mintun, 2021 N = 272; Donanemab, n = 131; placebo, n = 126 75.2 ± 5.5 years 145 (53.3%) Mean (SD) MMSE score: 23.5 ± 3.1
(13.0–30.0)
197/270 (73.0%) patients; 141 heterozygotes and 56 homozygotes Difference between the Donanemab and placebo groups in the change from baseline at 76 weeks for iADRS was 32% (p = 0.04) in favor of Donanemab, calculated through the following scores: a reduction of 6.86 from 106.2 baseline iADRS scores in the intervention group and 10.06 reduction from a baseline score of 105.9; difference between the Donanemab and placebo groups in change from baseline to 76 weeks were −0.36 for the CDR-SB score, −1.86 for the ADAS-Cog13 score, 1.21 for the ADCS-iADL score, and 0.64 for the MMSE score; there was an 84.13 CL reduction in the Donanemab group on Florbetapir PET from baseline scores of 108 CL; amyloid negative status (amyloid plaque level of < 24.10 CL) was found in 52 (40.0%) patients, 78 (59.8%) patients, and 89 (67.8%) patients at 24, 52, and 76 weeks; there was no change in global tau load from baseline to 76 weeks as assessed by flortaucipir PET; at 52 and 76 weeks, there was a greater decrease in whole-brain volume and greater increase in ventricular volume in the Donanemab group vs. the placebo group No significant difference between the Donanemab group and the placebo group in the incidence of death or serious adverse events; 119 of 131 participants (90.8%) in the Donanemab group and 113 of 125 participants (90.4%) in the placebo group had at least one adverse event; 35 of 131 (26.7%) participants developed an ARIA-E in the Donanemab group of whom 8 (6.1%) participants were symptomatic and 1 of 125 (0.8%) participants developed an ARIA-E in the placebo group; 40 of 131 (30.5%) participants had an ARIA-H event in the Donanemab group and 9 of 125 (7.2%) participants had an ARIA-H event in the placebo group; cerebral microhemorrage was present in 10 of 131 participants (7.6%) and 3 of 125 participants (2.4%) in the Donanemab and placebo group, respectively; superficial siderosis was present in 18 of 131 (13.7%) participants in the Donanemab group and 4 of 125 (3.2%) participants in the placebo group; infusion-related reaction was present in 10 of 131 (7.6%) participants in the Donanemab group and did not occur in the placebo group
4 Shcherbinin, 2022 N = 272; Donanemab, n = 131; placebo, n = 126; combination, n = 15 75.2 ± 5.5 years 145 (53.3%) Same as Mintun (2021) Same as Mintun (2021) 46 of 115 (40%) of Donanemab participants reached a complete amyloid clearance threshold of 24.1 CL (r: –0.54), placebo-treated participants did have changed amyloid clearance change appreciably (r: –0.194); achieved amyloid clearance was sustained with a mean rate of reaccumulation of 0.02 CL (SD: 7.75) over a 1-year period; those who achieved an amyloid level ≤ 11 CL at week 24 would require a mean time of 3.9 years [95% CI: 1.9–8.3 years] to regain amyloid plaque levels above the threshold (>24.1 CL); a 34% slowing of overall tau level, measured using SUVR, was observed for Donanemab compared to placebo in the entire cohort at 76 weeks All-cause mortality was lower in Donanemab-intervened participants (n = 1, 0.76%) compared to placebo (n = 2, 1.6%); no differences were reported in serious adverse effects among Donanemab (n = 26, 19.85%) and placebo (n = 25, 20%) groups

* Q2: Every 2 weeks. ** Q4: Every 4 weeks. Acronyms: AD: Alzheimer’s disease; ADAS-Cog13: the 13-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale; ADCS-iADL: the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory; ARIA: Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities; ARIA-E: Amyloid-related abnormalities due to cerebral edema; ARIA-H: Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities due to hemosiderin deposition and hemorrhage; CDR-SB: Clinical Dementia Rating Scale–Sum of Boxes; CL: Centiloids; iADRS: Integrated Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale; MCI: Mild cognitive impairment; MMSE: Mini-mental state examination; PET: Positron emission tomography; SD: standard deviation; SE: Standard error; SUVR: Standardized uptake value ratio; TE-ADA: Treatment-emergent anti-Donanemab antibodies; TRAE: Treatment-related adverse events.