Table 3.
Author (Year) | Event Stamp | Segmentation Methods | Feature Extraction Strategy/Source |
---|---|---|---|
Afkari [30] | Ev | Manual segmentation | Time domain raw signal |
Amft and Troster [31] | Ep | Frame at 250 ms | Feature Similarity Instance |
Bi et al. [32] | Ev | HMM-based on Mel frequency cepstral coefficients | Predetermined time-domain, frequency-domain, and non-linear features |
Fontana et al. [33] | Ep | Frame at 1.0 s & 1.5 s | Time domain raw signal |
Fukuike et al. [34] | Ev | Identifying the semblable wave period by moving average. A period longer than 0.35 s was regarded as a swallowing event | Time domain raw signal |
Kurihara et al. [35] | Ev | Manual prepared template for pattern matching | |
Lee et al. [36] | Ep | Frame at 200 ms with 50% overlap | Signal variance |
Makeyev et al. [37] | Ev & Ep | 1.5 s epoch | Mel-scale Fourier spectrum with PCA |
Sazonov et al. [38] | Ev & Ep | Grid search on epoch duration and step size | Frequency domain raw signal |
Sejdic et al. [39] | Ev | Minimum Description Length-based Sequential Segmentation | Time domain raw signal |
Skowronski et al. [40] | Ep | Manually segmentation at 6 s | Human factor cepstral coefficients and spectral flatness measure |
Ep: Epoch-based; Ev: Event-based; HMM: Hidden Markov Model; PCA: Principal Component Analysis.