Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 3;20(1):863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010863

Table 2.

Fit results and path coefficients for structural equation models.

(a) Mediating Role of Role Conflict between Laissez-Faire Leadership and Hostility
χ2 (df) GFI RMSEA AGFI NFI TLI CFI χ2/df
Model 1 53.764 (32) 0.944 0.062 0.904 0.947 0.969 0.978 1.680
Model 2 55.185 (33) 0.943 0.061 0.905 0.946 0.969 0.977 1.672
Model 3 85.705 (34) 0.917 0.092 0.866 0.916 0.930 0.947 2.521
Standardized Coefficients and (t-values)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
RC←LF 0.413 (5.29) 0.417 (5.35) ***
HO←RC 0.211 (1.96) * 0.212 (2.92) **
HO←LF 0.128 (1.51) 0.211 (2.78) **
(b) Mediating Role Of Role Conflict between Laissez-Faire Leadership and Emotional Exhaustion
χ2 (df) GFI RMSEA AGFI NFI TLI CFI χ2/df
Model 1 106.618 (50) 0.968 0.08 0.856 0.933 0.951 0.963 2.132
Model 2 109.592 (51) 0.906 0.081 0.856 0.931 0.950 0.961 2.168
Model 3 153.702 (53) 0.875 0.0105 0.813 0.904 0.916 0.934 2.956
Standardized Coefficients and (t-values)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
RC←LF 0.414 (5.31) *** 0.425 (5.38) ***
EE←RC 3.76 (3.51) *** 0.460 (5.82) ***
EE←LF 0.172 (1.72) * 0.325 (3.92) ***

Note: Model 1: partial mediation; Model 2: fully mediation; Model 3: direct effects.* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.