Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 28;20(1):492. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010492

Table 3.

Relationship between work–life balance and the dimension of occupational stress: (mental health) controlled by socio-demographic variables. Results of multiple linear regression analysis.

Satisfaction and Peace of Mind Dynamism Peace and Energy
Standardized
Beta
Coefficient
Significance Standardized Beta
Coefficient
Significance Standardized Beta
Coefficient
Significance
2003 (n = 441)
Work–life balance 0.214 0.000 - - 0.219 0.000
Gender (1—female, 2—male) 0.187 0.000 - - 0.198 0.000
Age 0.092 0.049 - - - -
Education (1—lower than university, 2—university) - - - - - -
Professional status: owner (ref. specialist) - - - - - -
Professional status: manager (ref. specialist) 0.141 0.000
Marital status—married (ref. single) - - - - - -
Marital status—divorced (ref. single) - - −0.099 0.038 - -
Marital status—widowed (ref. single) - - - - - -
Having children up to 18 living in the household 0.121 0.010 - - - -
Working time (in hours) - - - - - -
Adjusted R Square 0.082 0.008 1 0.093
2013 (n = 469)
Work–life balance 0.294 0.000 - - 0.305 0.000
Gender (1—female, 2—male) 0.169 0.000 - - - -
Age 0.147 0.001 −0.184 0.000 - -
Education (1—lower than university, 2—university) - - - - −0.100 0.025
Professional status: owner (ref. specialist) - - - - - -
Professional status: manager (ref. specialist) - - - - - -
Marital status—married (ref. single) - - 0.117 0.032 - -
Marital status—divorced (ref. single) - - 0.191 0.000 - -
Marital status—widowed (ref. single) - - - - - -
Having children up to 18 living in the household - - - - - -
Working time (in hours) - - −0.104 0.024 - -
Adjusted R Square 0.120 0.035 0.092

1 model is not significant. - There is no significant relationship.