Table 5.
The effect of relocation type on the community resilience of relocated households in the case of PAR.
| Variables | Low-Level Community Resilience | High-Level Community Resilience | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. | Std. | Wald | Coef. | Std. | Wald | |
| Relocation type | ||||||
| Poverty alleviation | 1.366 ** | 0.686 | 3.960 | −0.122 ** | 0.438 | 0.000 |
| Project-induced | 1.840 *** | 0.744 | 6.101 | −1.271 *** | 0.705 | 3.240 |
| Disaster-related | 1.504 *** | 0.663 | 5.153 | −0.004 ** | 0.410 | 0.090 |
| Other reasons | 2.482 *** | 0.705 | 12.390 | −0.489 *** | 0.511 | 0.922 |
| household size | −0.175 *** | 0.081 | 4.666 | 0.078 *** | 0.080 | 0.960 |
| Income diversification | −1.591 *** | 0.514 | 9.548 | 1.480 *** | 0.443 | 11.156 |
| Net income per capita | −0.159 ** | 0.103 | 2.372 | 0.266 *** | 0.094 | 8.066 |
| Age of household head | −0.075 ** | 0.093 | 0.656 | 0.286 ** | 0.117 | 5.905 |
| Knowledge of relocation policies | −0.003 | 0.010 | 0.084 | 0.015 ** | 0.011 | 1.850 |
| Possibility of loan | −0.003 | 0.001 | 7.784 | 0.000 *** | 0.000 | 0.185 |
| Monthly communication cost of household members | −0.131 ** | 0.117 | 1.254 | 0.067 ** | 0.108 | 0.384 |
| Constant | 0.786 *** | 1.253 | 0.397 | −5.250 *** | 1.353 | 15.054 |
| Log-likelihood | −422.274 | |||||
| Pseudo R2 | 0.132 | |||||
| Number of observations | 459 | |||||
Note: “relocation type” takes households relocated by ecological restoration as the reference group; **, *** indicate statistical significance at the level of 5%, and 1%, respectively.