Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;2022(1):539-550. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2022000404

Table 3.

Summary of select data from randomized trials for induction therapy for transplant-eligible NDMM

Reference Patients: total/arms, No. Median follow-up, mo Median age, y Regimen PFS OS
GIMEMA62 236 vs 238 43 57 VTd vs Td 3-y PFS 68% vs 56% 3-y 86% vs 84%
IFM2013-0463 169 vs 169 NR 59.5 VTd vs VCd NR NR
EMNO2/HO9523 495 vs 702 60.3 58 VCd-ASCT vs
VCd-VMP
Median PFS 56.7 vs 41.9 mo (HR, 0.73, P  =  .0001) 5-y OS 75.1% vs 71.6% (HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.71-1.13; P  =  .35)
STAMINA24
247 vs 254 vs 257 38 56 ASCT-R vs
ASCT-VRd-R vs
Tandem ASCT-R
38-mo PFS rate:
ASCT/ASCT-R: 58.5% (95% CI, 51.7%-64.6%)
ASCT-VRd-R: 57.8% (95% CI, 51.4%-63.7%)
ASCT-R: 53.9% (95% CI, 47.4%-60%)
OS:
ASCT+ R: 81.8% (95% CI, 76.2%-86.2%)
ASCT-VRd-R: 85.4% (95% CI, 80.4%-89.3%)
ASCT-R: 83.7% (95% CI, 78.4%-87.8%)
IFM 200925
350 vs 350 44 59.5 RVd-ASCT-R
RVd-R
Median 50 vs 36 mo
(HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80; P  <  .001)
4 y: 81% vs 82%
(HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.80-1.68; P  =  .87)
DETERMINATION7 365 vs 357 76 56 RVd-ASCT-R
RVd-R
Median: 67.5 vs 46.2 mo (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.23-1.91; P  <  .001) 5 y: 79% vs 81% (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73-1.65; P  >  .99)
FORTE8,9 158 vs 157 vs 159 50.9 57 KRd-ASCT-KRd
KRd12
KCd-ASCT-KCd
3 y: 68.8% vs 68.5% vs 67.2% (P  =  .86)
4 y: 69% (KRd-ASCT) vs 56% (KRd12) vs 51% (KCd-ASCT)
HR for KRd-ASCT vs KCd-ASCT, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.78; P  =  .0008
HR for KRd-ASCT vs KRd12, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.88; P  =  .0084
4 y: 86% (KRd-ASCT) vs 85% (KRd12) vs 76% (KCd-ASCT)
GRIFFIN12 104 vs 103 22.1
60 (27%> 65 y) D-RVd-ASCT-DR
RVd-ASCT-R
3 y: 88.9% vs 81.2% (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.01) 3 y: 92.6% vs 92.2% (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.32-2.57)
CASSIOPEIA11 543 vs 542 18.8 58.5 R1: D-VTd-ASCT-D-VTd
VTd-ASCT-VTd
R2: D maint vs obs
Median: NR in either arm (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.67; P  <  .0001) Median: NR in either arm (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80)
GMMG-HD652
139 vs 141 vs 137 vs 142
49.8 59 RVd-ASCT-R
RVd-ASCT-EloR
Elo-RVd-ASCT-R
Elo-RVd-ASCT-EloR
3 y: 68.8% vs 68.5% vs 66.2% vs 67.2% (P  =  .86) 3 y: 89.4% vs 89.1% vs 92.5% vs 89.7% (P  =  .43)

ASCT, autologous stem cell transplant; D, daratumumab; DR, daratumumab, lenalidomide; Elo, elotuzumab; maint, maintenance; NR, not reported; obs, observation; R, lenalidomide; Td, thalidomide, dexamethasone; V, bortezomib; VCd, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone; VMP, bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone; VTd, bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone; VRd, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone.