Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 23;12(1):106. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010106

Table 5.

Comparative results between control and negative-pressure wound therapy groups.

Control Group NP Group p Value
Variables n = 13 n = 12
Off-bed time (days) 5.5 ± 0.8 4.6 ± 1.1 0.028 *
Drainage amount (mL) 166.8 ± 62.9 156.9 ± 57.3 0.701
Vacuum ball removed timing (post-op days) 8.4 ± 1.4 7.7 ± 1.5 0.269
Vancouver scar scale 5.3 ± 2.9 5.8 ± 2.5 0.693
Re-exploration 2 (15.4%) 1 (8.3%) 1.000
Donor site acute complications (<30 days) 3 (23.1%) 0 0.22
  Wound breakdown required surgery 2 0
  Wound dehiscence with wound care 1 0
Donor site long-term complications (>30 days) 3 (23.1%) 1 (8.3%) 0.593
  Wound breakdown required surgery 1 1
  Wound dehiscence with wound care 2 0
Donor-site revision 3 (23.1%) 2 (16.7%) 1.000
Lower limb lymphedema 0 0
Distortion of major labia 0 0

Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. NP, negative pressure. * p < 0.05.