Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 29;12(1):274. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010274

Table 3.

Studies on efficacy of MPLT in DME treatment.

Article Design Evaluated on Results
Nakamura et al.,
2010 [38]
Prospective
810 nm MPLT
200 μm/200 ms/15% DC
titrated to 2× CWL power,
without papillomacular bundle
28 eyes
diffuse DME
FU = 3
Significant improvement in BCVA; significant reduction in CRT (from 481 ± 110 to 388 ± 127 μm). Central retinal sensitivity did not improve significantly.
Ohkoshi et al.,
2010 [53]
Prospective
810 nm MPLT
200 μm/200–300 ms/15% DC
titrated to 2× CWL power
43 eyes
CS-DME < 600 μm
FU = 3
BCVA did not change significantly. Significant reduction in CRT (from 341.8 ± 119.0 to 289.5 ± 122.8 μm).
Takatsuna et al.,
2011 [52]
Retrospective
810 nm MPLT
200 μm/100 ms/15% DC
titrated to 2× CWL power
56 eyes
DME
FU = 12
BCVA did not change significantly. Significant reduction in CRT (from 504.3 ± 105.8 to 320.4 ± 134.9 μm).
Luttrull et al.,
2014 [14]
Retrospective
810 nm MPLT
125–200 μm/300 ms/5% DC
fixed 780 mW or 950 mW
39 eyes
CI-DME, V > 20/40
FU = 12
Significant improvement in BCVA (logMAR from 0.19 ± 0.11 to 0.16 ± 0.09); significant reduction in CRT for eyes with CRT < 300 μm (from 248.3 ± 27.8 to 229.4 ± 34.3 μm). No evidence of MPLT injury to RPE.
Kwon et al.,
2014 [51]
Retrospective
577 nm MPLT
100 μm/20 ms/15% DC
titrated to immediately below CWL power
3 × 3 pattern, 1.5 widths
14 eyes
DME > 260 μm
FU = 8
Significant improvement of BCVA (logMAR from 0.51 ± 0.42 to 0.40 ± 0.35). Nonsignificant decrease in CRT. No laser scars detected in color photographs, FAF, IR, and FA.
Mansouri et al.,
2014 [50]
Retrospective
810 nm MPLT
CRT ≤ 400 μm vs. CRT > 400 μm
125 μm/300 ms/5% DC
fixed 950 mW
63 eyes
DME
FU = 12
Significant reduction in CRT and gain in BCVA in patients with CRT ≤ 400 μm, stable CRT and BCVA in patients with CRT > 400 μm. No adverse effect from MPLT.
Nicolò et al.,
2014 [49]
Retrospective
577 nm MPLT
Naïve vs. previously treated DME
200 μm/200 ms/5% DC
fixed 200 mW
22 eyes
DME
FU = 6
Significant improvement in BCVA (logMAR from 0.39 ± 0.19 to 0.27 ± 0.17) and CRT (from 350.9 ± 74.7 to 311.2 ± 49.43 μm) only in naïve patients. No evidence of RPE damage in FAF.
Inagaki et al.,
2015 [18]
Prospective
810 nm MPLT + 561 nm focal laser of microaneurysms
vs. 577 nm MPLT + 577 nm focal laser of microaneurysms
200 μm/200 ms/15% DC
titrated to 2× CWL power,
up to 500 μm from fovea
53 eyes
CS-DME
FU = 12
Similar significant reduction in CRT on both groups. Stable BCVA in both groups. Retreatment rate higher in 810 nm group (16.7% vs. 3.4%). Mean power lower in 577 nm group (204.1 vs. 954.1 mW).
Abouhussein et al.,
2016 [48]
Prospective
577 nm MPLT
previously treated
200 μm/200 ms/5% DC
fixed 400 mW
20 eyes
CI-DME ≤ 400 μm
FU = 6
Significant improvement in BCVA (logMAR from 0.42 ± 0.15 to 0.3 ± 0.26), significant reduction in CRT (from 354.3 ± 32.96 to 310.7 ± 52.62 μm). No evidence of retinal scars in fundus photography or FA.
Latalska et al.,
2017 [47]
Prospective
577 nm MPLT
Rural vs. urban patients
100 μm/20 ms/5% DC
titrated to 2× CWL power
75 eyes
Diffuse DME
FU = 6
More significant treatment effects in rural patients. Significant improvement of reading visual acuity and decrease in CRT in both groups. BVCA remained stable. No retinal damage.
Değirmenci et al.,
2018 [54]
Retrospective
577 nm MPLT
160 μm/200 ms/5% DC
titrated to 0.5× visible MPLT power
9 eyes
non-FI-DME
FU = 3
Significant decrease in mean retinal thickness (from 470.6 to 416 μm). Nonsignificant improvement of BCVA. No evidence of laser scars in FAF.
Vesela et al.,
2018 [46]
Retrospective
577 nm MLPT
160 μm/200 ms/5% DC
titrated to 0.3–0.5× CWL power
63 eyes
DME
FU = 12
Significant decrease in CRT (from 442 to 379 μm). Stabilization of BCVA.
Citirik et al.,
2019 [56]
Prospective
577 nm MPLT
CRT 250–300 μm vs. 301–400 μm vs. > 400 μm vs. healthy control
160 μm/200 ms/5% DC
titrated to 0.5× visible MPLT power
80 eyes
recurrent DME
after injection
FU = 6
Significant reduction in CRT (from 276.0 ± 22.44 to 238.57 ± 25.87 μm) and gain in BCVA (logMAR from 0.52 ± 0.05 to 0.38 ± 0.04) only in patients with pretreatment CRT ≤ 300 μm.
Vujosevic et al.,
2020 [44,45]
Prospective
577 nm MLPT vs. control
100 μm/200 ms/5% DC
fixed 250 mW, 7 × 7 pattern
52 eyes
naïve DME ≤ 400 μm
FU = 12
Significant increase in BCVA (ETDRS score from 69.4 ± 12.0 to 76.0 ± 9.1). Significantly decrease in hyper-reflective retinal spots, microaneurysms, DRIL.
CRT did not change. Stable parameters in control group. No need for rescue treatment. No changes in FAF.
Donati et al.,
2021 [16]
Retrospective
577 nm MPLT
fixed vs. variable treatment regimen
100 μm/200 ms/5% DC
fixed 450 mW or titrated to 4× CWL power
39 eyes
DME < 400 μm
FU = 12
Equally significant decrease in CRT in both groups. No significant improvement in BCVA in both groups.
Frizziero et al.,
2021 [57]
Retrospective
577 nm MPLT
100 μm/200 ms/5% DC/fixed 250 mW
134 eyes
naïve CI-DME
CRT ≤ 400 μm
FU = 12
Significant improvement in BCVA (EDTRS score from 77.3 ± 4.5 to 79.4 ± 4.4). No significant CRT reduction. No adverse effects in FAF and OCT.
Kikushima et al.,
2021 [19]
Retrospective
577 nm vs. 670 nm MPLT
200 μm/200 ms/10% DC
titrated to immediately below CWL power
43 eyes
DME
FU = 1
Both lasers maintained BCVA. CRT equally significantly decreased in both groups. No changes in FAF.
Nowacka et al.,
2021 [58]
Prospective
577 nm MPLT
5% DC, titrated, not exceeding 350 mW
21 eyes
CI-DME
CRT < 400 μm
FU = 6
No significant change in BCVA, CRT, bioelectrical function of cones, and bipolar cells in mfERG.
Passos et al.,
2021 [42]
Retrospective
577 nm MPLT
160 μm/200 ms/5% DC
titrated to 0.5× CWL power
56 eyes
CI-DME
FU = 3
Significant improvement in BCVA (logMAR from 0.59 ± 0.32 to 0.43 ± 0.25). Different OCT instruments disabled CRT analysis.
Ueda et al.,
2021 [40]
Prospective
577 nm MPLT
Evaluation of the dynamics of retinal healing process
100 μm/200 ms/5% DC
titrated to 0.5× CWL power, 7 × 7 pattern
11 eyes
DME
FU = 6
Decrease in RPE entropy after MPLT on polarization-sensitive OCT. No visible signs in color photography, FAF, and OCT. No significant changes in BCVA and CRT.
Valera-Cornejo et al.,
2021 [41]
Prospective
577 nm MPLT
naïve vs. previously treated DME
100–150 μm/200 ms/5% DC
titrated to 0.5× CWL power, 8 × 8 pattern
33 eyes
CI-DME < 700 μm
FU = 3
No significant changes in BCVA for both groups. Significant reduction in CRT (from 420 ± 121 to 390 ± 130 μm) in naïve group. No adverse events in color photographs and FAF.
Işık et al.,
2022 [39]
Retrospective
577 nm MPLT
MPLT vs. healthy control
160 μm/200 ms/5% DC
titrated to 0.5× visible MPLT power
40 eyes
CI-DME
FU = 3
Significant increase in BCVA; significant decrease in CRT. Area of central RPE measured in EDI-OCT was smaller in patients requiring retreatment.
Marashi et al.,
2022 [59]
Retrospective
532 nm focal threshold laser of microaneurysms + 532 nm grid MPLT
125 μm/200 ms/5% DC
titrated to 0.5× CWL power
12 eyes
DME
CRT > 300 μm
FU = 6
Significant reduction in CRT (from 336.58 ± 86.36 to 264.33 ± 61.41 μm). Stable BCVA. Minimal scar formation. Four eyes required anti-VEGF injection.

MPLT, micropulse laser treatment; CWL, continuous-wave laser; DME, diabetic macular edema; FU, follow-up (in months); BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; CRT, central retinal thickness; CS, clinically significant; CI, center involved; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; IR, infrared; FA, fluoresceine angiography; DRIL, disorganization of inner retinal layers; mfERG, multifocal electroretinography; EDI, enhanced-depth imaging.