Andreassi et al |
2020 |
Occupationally exposed male workers (cardiac catheterization) |
~ 1–10 mSv/year |
Chen et al |
2018 |
Paternal exposure to medical-related radiation |
Not measured, anticipated to be low |
Chiarelli et al |
2000 |
Radiation exposure to treat childhood cancer |
Abdominal-pelvic radiation cumulative total dose was above the 50th percentile (> 2,500 cG) was high exposure group |
Choi et al |
2012 |
Pregnant women exposed to abdominal or lumbar radio diagnostic procedures |
Radiation exposures between 50 and 100 mGy (5–10 rad) |
Doyle et al |
2000 |
Nuclear industry employees |
Exposure distribution not described, but those with exposures greater than 100 mSv had no excess in either sex |
Fucic et al |
2008 |
Female populations occupationally exposed to radiation |
Exposures were < 10 mSv per year and no woman received a radiation dose that exceeded the international limit of 20 mSv per year or 100 mSv over 5 years |
Goldberg et al |
1997 |
Adolescent females exposed to radiation for scoliosis |
Median exposure of 0.69 cGy |
Gong et al |
2017 |
Maternal residential proximity to nuclear facilities |
No exposure data. Exposure categorized based on distance |
Grajewski et al |
2015 |
Occupational exposure among flight attendants |
Median effective dose between 0.36 and 0.91 mSv |
Green et al |
2002 |
Pregnancy outcomes of female survivors of childhood cancer |
No direct measure of exposure as contrasts made between those with radiation and other types of treatment |
Green et al |
2010 |
Radiation for treatment of Wilms tumor |
Detailed exposure profile not available, however, 16% of women and 9% of men received exposures > 35 Gy |
Guilbaud et al |
2019 |
Pregnancy outcome after first trimester exposure to radiation |
Median fetal dose of 3.1 mGy |
Ha et al |
2015 |
Residential proximity to power plants |
No exposure data. Exposure categorized based on distance |
Hatch et al |
2017 |
Neonatal outcomes following radiation exposure in utero to fallout from Chernobyl |
Cs-137 deposition levels greater than 37 kBq/m |
Hujoel et al |
2004 |
Antepartum dental radiography and infant low birth weight |
Exposed group consisted of mothers with > 0.4 mGy |
Igumnov & Drozdovitch |
2000 |
Children from Belarus exposed in utero to radiation from Chernobyl accident |
Mean value of thyroid doses from 131I 0.39 Gy was estimated for the prenatal exposed children |
Kallen et al |
1998 |
Outcome of reproduction in women irradiated for skin hemangioma in infancy |
The mean ovarian dose was 6 cGy, and the maximum was 8.55 Gy |
Lawson et al |
2012 |
Occupational exposure among nurses |
No direct measure of exposure, but rather frequency of working with X-rays was modelled |
Mortazavi et al |
2013 |
Radiation exposure in a screening program of pregnant women |
No characterization of exposure provided |
Parker et al |
1999 |
Exposure among male radiation workers at Sellafield nuclear plant |
The median exposure among of all live births was 0.13 mSv; the median exposure among stillbirths was 0.33 mSv |
Reulen et al |
2009 |
Radiation exposure for childhood cancer |
No characterization of exposure provided |
Signorello et al |
2006 |
Radiation exposure for childhood cancer |
Ovarian irradiation only among women with a dose < 100 cGy to the uterus |
Tsou et al |
2019 |
Taiwanese radiation-contaminated buildings (RCBs) natural accident |
Taiwan Cumulative Dose exposure assessment system |
van de Loo |
2019 |
Radiation exposure to treat childhood cancer |
Comparison of outcomes among childhood cancer survivors’ exposure to radiation to non-radiation treatments |
Winther et al |
2008 |
Radiation exposure to treat childhood cancer |
Highly variable across cancer sites with exposure up to 50 Gy |
Zhang et al |
2020 |
Prenatal uranium exposure in general population |
Geometric mean of U concentration of 0.03 ug/L |