Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 2;53(1):63–73. doi: 10.1007/s10519-022-10122-x

Table 1.

Parameter levels on the three factorial designs, with respective total number of cells for each design simulation

θ Design 1 (ACE) Design 2 (AE) Design 3 (AE)
b1 0.025, 0.05 0.025, 0.05,0.075 -0.075, -0.03, 0.03, 0.075
b3 0.025, 0.05 0.025, 0.05, 0.075 -0.075, -0.03, 0.03, 0.075
g1 0.020, 0.05 0.020, 0.04, 0.06 -0.050, -0.020, 0.050, 0.020
g2 0.020, 0.05 0.020, 0.04, 0.06 -0.050, -0.020, 0.050, 0.020
ra 0.25, 0.50 0.0, 0.25, 0.50 0.3
rc 0.25, 0.50 0 0
re 0.25, 0.50 0.0, 0.25, 0.50 0.3
rf 0.25, 0.50 0.0, 0.25, 0.50 0.3
a1 0.10, 0.25 0.10, 0.25 0.5
a2 0.10, 0.25 0.10, 0.25 0.3
c1 0.10, 0.25 0 0
c2 0.10, 0.25 0 0
Total cells 212 = 4096 37*22 = 8748 44 = 256

The model specification can be seen in Fig. 2. Also, e1 was specified as 1-a12-c12 and e2 as 1-a22-c22. Table 4 exemplifies rows extracted from Design 3