Table 1.
Number of patients | Country of study | Ivermectin dose | Description/outcome | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive responded studies | 280 | United States | 200 mg/kg/day |
1) Reduced mortality in both general and severe lung disease patients compared to the control 2) No significant difference in length of hospitalization relative to the control |
Rajter et al. (2021) |
69 | Iran | 0.2 mg/kg/day | Significantly reduced mean dyspnea, persistent cough, hospitalization, and incidence of lymphopenia | Shahbaznejad et al. (2021a) | |
72 | Bangladesh | 12 mg | The safety and effectiveness of Ivermectin were confirmed as well as the effect of Ivermectin on the virus clearance rate and improvement of clinical symptoms | Ahmed et al. (2021) | |
66 | Turkey | 200 µg/kg/day | Improved clinical recovery, improve prognostic test indicators, and reduce mortality | Okumuş et al. (2021) | |
Negative responded studies | 125 | India | 12 and 24 mg/day | Increased negative RT-PCR tests or decreased viral loads in patients receiving Covid19, but no statistically significant difference compared with the placebo group | Mohan et al. (2021) |
490 | Malaysia | 0.4 mg/kg/day | No significant difference compared to the control, so treatment with Ivermectin in the early stages of COVID-19 could not prevent the disease from progressing to more serious stages | Lim et al. (2022b) | |
501 | Argentina | 12 and 18 mg/day | No significant difference compared to the control | Vallejos et al. (2021) | |
476 | Colombia | 300 g/kg/day | No significant improved symptom remission of COVID-19 | López-Medina et al. (2021) | |
100 | Lebanon | 9 mg, 12 mg, and 150 µg/kg |
1) Significantly elevated Ct values compared with the control group 2) Fewer symptoms, lower viral loads, and fewer hospitalizations compared with the control group |
Samaha et al. (2021) |