Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 28;15(1):134. doi: 10.3390/nu15010134

Table 3.

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for distal radius fracture in the gout and control groups with subgroup analyses according to age and sex.

Characteristics No. of Distal Radius Fracture/
No. of Participants
Follow-Up Duration,
Person-Years
Incidence Rate,
Per 1000
Person-Years
Hazard Ratios for Distal Radius Fracture
Crude p Adjusted p
Total participants (n = 81,525)
Gout 277/16,305 97,976 2.8 1.06 (0.93–1.21) 0.401 1.06 (0.93–1.21) 0.413
Control 1052/65,220 392,452 2.7 1 1
Age < 60 years old (n = 44,945)
Gout 142/8989 61,058 2.3 1.09 (0.91–1.31) 0.367 1.08 (0.90–1.31) 0.411
Control 525/35,956 245,087 2.1 1 1
Age ≥ 60 years old (n = 36,580)
Gout 135/7316 36,918 3.7 1.03 (0.85–1.24) 0.774 1.03 (0.85–1.25) 0.766
Control 527/29,264 147,365 3.6 1 1
Males (n = 69,705)
Gout 169/13,941 83,807 2.0 1.04 (0.88–1.23) 0.666 1.06 (0.89–1.26) 0.519
Control 652/55,764 335,341 1.9 1 1
Females (n = 11,820)
Gout 108/2364 14,169 7.6 1.09 (0.88–1.35) 0.414 1.05 (0.85–1.31) 0.645
Control 400/9,456 57,111 7.0 1 1

Stratified Cox proportional hazard model, Significance at p < 0.05 with Bonferroni correction. Models were stratified by age, sex, income, and region of residence. Adjusted for total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, osteoporosis history and Charlson comorbidity index score.