Table 2. Table of included studies showing the characteristics of the studies used in this meta-analysis.
Author | Year of publication | Population of cancer patients | Country | Type of Study | Method of breast cancer assessment | Method of health and dietary assessment | “OR” or “RR” (99% confidence interval) |
Fung et al. [8] | 2011 | 3,314 | USA | Case-control | Histology | Questionnaire and interview | 0.8 (0.64, 1.01) |
Kruk, and Marchlewicz [9] | 2010 | 858 | Poland | Case-control | Histology | Interview | 1.66 (1.0 7, 3.59) |
Jones et al. [10] | 2014 | 172 | USA | Case-control | MRI | Questionnaire and interview | 0.40 (0.3 3, 1.03) |
Berkey et al. [11] | 2019 | 9031 | USA | Cohort | Histology | Questionnaire | 2.27 (1.9 8, 3.87) |
Dydjow-Bendek, and Zagoźdźon [12] | 2020 | 201 | Poland | Cohort | Histology | Questionnaire and interview | 0.40 (0.1 9, 0.85) |
Khankari et al. [13] | 2016 | 1506 | USA | Case-control | Histology | Questionnaire | 0.41 (0.0 6, 0.76) |
Link et al. [14] | 2013 | 91,779 | USA | Cohort | Histology | Questionnaire | 1.29 (1.1 2, 1.49) |
Turati et al. [15] | 2010 | 3034 | Switzerland and Italy | Case-control | Histology | Questionnaire and interview | 0.86 (0.7 6, 0.98) |