Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 21;15(1):14. doi: 10.3390/nu15010014

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

First Author (Year) Location Study Name Design Study Population Participants Cases Age, yrs Study Duration Years of Follow Up Type of Vitamin E Intake Intake Assessment Method Vitamin E Cut-Offs Adjustments for Covariates
Cano-Ibáñez N (2020)
[27]
Spain CAPLIFE Case-control study Cases: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer at two main university hospitals
Controls: Population-based controls
704 402 Mean: 66.7
Range: 40–80
2017–2019 - Dietary FFQ Adequate intake (8.6 mg/d to 300 mg/d) vs. inadequate intake Age, smoking habits, physical activity level, educational level, alcohol intake, and first-degree family history of prostate cancer.
Lane JA (2017)
[28]
UK - Nested case-control study Cases: Men in the Dietary Cohort Consortium Studies diagnosed with prostate cancer
Controls: Cohort controls
5245 1717 Mean: 62.8
Range: 50–60
1991–2009 Mean: 6.6–13.3 years Dietary Food diary Quintiles:
7.1 mg/d, 9.0 mg/d, 11.1 mg/d, 14.1 mg/d
Age, BMI, socioeconomic, smoking, and marital status, diabetes, and energy intake.
Sarre S (2016)
[29]
Finland FinsRPC Prospective cohort study Men participating in the third round of the FrRSPC without previous diagnosis of prostate cancer 11,795 757 Median: 66.0 2004–2013 Median: 6.6 years Supplemental Self-reported use of supplements Use vs. no use Age.
Roswall N (2013)
[30]
Netherlands - Prospective cohort study Male residents in Denmark 26,865 1571 Median: 56.0
Range: 50–64
1993–2010 Median: 14.3 years Dietary, Supplemental, Total FFQ, self-reported use of supplements Quartiles for dietary: 7.3 mg/d, 9.5 mg/d, 12.0 mg/d; Supplements: 0 mg/d, 4.4 mg/d, 10 mg/d; Total: 8.6 mg/d, 12.0 mg/d, 17.7 mg/d Intake of the three other micronutrients as well as dietary intake or supplemental intake of vitamin E.
Wang L (2014)
[11]
United States PHS II RCT Male physicians aged 50 yrs and above 13,980 1373 Mean: 64.3 1997–2011 - Supplemental Intervention 400 IU vs. no use every other day Age, PHS cohort and randomised assignment
Agalliu I (2011)
[31]
Canada CSDLH Case-cohort study Male participants in the CSDLH study recruited from universities in Canada 2525 661 Mean: 68.4 1992–2003 Mean: 4.3 years Total FFQ, self-reported use of supplements Quintile (median value reported): 6.3 mg/d, 8.3 mg/d, 14.6 mg/d, 264.4 mg/d, 462.0 mg/d Age, race, BMI, exercise activity, and education. Adjusted for energy intake using residual method.
Fleshner N (2011)
[13]
Canada - RCT Men with high-grade prostatic interepithelial neoplasia diagnosed within 18 months of random assignment 303 80 Median: 62.8 1999–2004 - Supplemental Intervention 400 IU/d vs. no use -
Klein EA (2011)
[12]
United States, Canada, Puerto Rico SELECT RCT Men with prostate- specific antigen concentrations of <4.0 ng/mL 17,433 1149 Median: 62.5 2004–2011 - Supplemental Intervention 400 IU/d vs. no use -
Raimondi S (2010)
[32]
Montreal, Canada - Case-control study Cases: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer at major teaching hospitals
Controls: Population-based controls identified by random-digit dialing
394 197 Range: 35–84 1989–1993 - Dietary FFQ Quartiles: 5.9 mg/d; 7.4 mg/d; 9.2 mg/d Family history of prostate cancer, age group, total energy intake, and calcium intake.
Bidoli E (2009)
[33]
Italy - Case-control study Cases: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer at teaching and general hospitals
Controls: Hospital-based controls
2745 1294 Median: 66
Range: 46–74
1992–2002 - Dietary FFQ Tertiles: 12.3 mg/d, 16.7 mg/d Age, study center, period of interview, education, body mass index, alcohol intake, smoking habits, family history of prostate cancer and total energy intake.
Peters U (2008)
[34]
United States VITAL Prospective cohort study Men living in western Washington State covered by the Surveilance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry 35,242 830 Range: 50–76 2000–2004 Not reported Dietary, Supplemental, Total FFQ, self-reported use of supplements Quartiles for dietary: 8.6 mg/d, 12.2 mg/d, 17.1 mg/d. For supplemental: None, 0–30 IU/d, >30–< 400 IU/d, ≥ 400 IU/d. Categories for total: <14.3 mg/d, 14.3–29.3 mg/d, 29.4–98.0 mg/d, ≥98.1 mg/d Age, family history of prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, income, multivitamin use, and stratified on PSA screening in the 2 years before baseline (yes/no), energy intake.
Zhang YQ (2009)
[35]
United States - Case-control study Cases: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer at participating hospitals
Controls: Hospital-based controls
4110 1706 Mean: 60.1
Range: 40–79
1976–2006 - Supplemental Self-reported use of supplements Duration of use: 10+ years, 5–9 years, 1–4 years, Never or <1 yr use Age, years of education, body mass index, current alcohol drinking, current smoking, family history of prostate cancer and use of other vitamin/mineral supplements.
Weinstein SJ (2007)
[36]
United States ATBC Prospective cohort study within trial Male smoker residents 29,133 1732 Mean: 57.2
Range: 50–69
1985–2004 Up to 19 years Dietary, Total FFQ, self-reported use of supplements Quintiles for total: 7.06 mg/d. 8.36 mg/d, 10.32 mg/d, 14.72 mg/d; Quintiles for dietary: 6.96 mg/d, 8.13 mg/d, 9.65 mg/d, 13.01 mg/d Age, trial arm, weight, urban residence, education, intakes of total energy, fat, polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamin C and lycopene.
Wright ME (2007)
[37]
United States NIH-AARP Prospective cohort study Men enrolled in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health study 295,344 10,241 Range: 50–71 1995–2000 Up to 5 years Dietary, Supplemental FFQ, self-reported use of supplements Quintile medians for dietary: 4.8 mg/d, 6.5 mg/d, 7.0 mg/d, 8.0 mg/d, 10.0 mg/d; For supplement: 0 IU/d, >0–99 IU/d, 100–199 IU.d, 200–399 IU/d, 400–799 IU/d. ≥800 IU/d Age, race, smoking status, education, personal history of diabetes, family history of prostate cancer, body mass index, and dietary intakes of red meat, a-linolenic acid, vitamin C, B carotene intake. Dietary tocopherols were adjusted for energy intake using theresidual method.
Kirsh VA (2006)
[38]
United States PLCO Cancer Screening Trial Prospective cohort study Men in the screening arm of the PLCO trial 29,361 1338 Mean: 63.3
Range: 55–74
1993–2001 Mean: 4.2 years Dietary, Supplemental FFQ, self-reported use of supplements Quintiles medians for dietary: 8.6 mg/d, 10.2 mg/d, 11.3 mg/d, 12.6 mg/d, 15.8 mg/d; For supplements: 0 IU/d, >0–30 IU/d, >30–400 IU/d, Age, total energy, race, study center, family history of prostate cancer, BMI, smoking status, physical activity, total fat intake, red meat intake, history of diabetes, aspirin use, number of screening examinations during follow-up period.
Stram DO (2006)
[39]
United States MEC Prospective cohort study Men from a large population-based multiethnic cohort 82,486 3922 Range: 45–75 1993–2001 Up to 7 years Dietary, Supplemental FFQ Quintiles for dietary: 3.9 mg/1000 kcal, 4.5 mg/1000 kcal, 5.1 mg/1000 kcal, 6.0 mg/1000 kcal; For supplements: 0–<33.75 mg/d, ≥33.75 mg/d Age, ethnicity, BMI, education and family history of prostate cancer. Intake of all foods and nutrients were analysed as nutrient densities.
Lonn E (2005)
[14]
Canada, United States, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and 14 Western European countries HOPE and HOPE-TOO RCT Male patients at high risk for cardiovascular events 6996 235 Mean: 66.0 1993–1999; 1999–2003 - Supplemental Intervention 400 IU/d vs. 0 IU.d -
McCann SE (2005)
[40]
United States WNYDS Case-control study Cases: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer from major hospitals
Controls: Population-based controls
971 433 Mean: 69.5 1986–1991 - Dietary FFQ Quartile range: <7 mg/d. 7–9 mg/d, 9–11 mg/d, >11 mg/d Age, education, BMI, cigarette smoking status, total energy, vegetable intake.
Meyer F (2005)
[10]
Canada SU.VI.MAX RCT Healthy male volunteers 5034 103 Mean: 51.3
Range: 45–60
1994–2002 - Supplemental Intervention 30 mg/day vs. no use -
Hodge M (2004)
[41]
Australia - Case-control study Cases: Australian male residents with prostate cancer
Controls: Population-based controls
1763 858 Range: < 70 1994–1997 - Dietary FFQ Quintile range: <6.9 mg/d, 6.9–8.0 mg/d, 8.1–9.0 mg/d. 9.1–10.3 mg/d, ≥10.4 mg/d State, age group, year, country of birth, socio-economic group, family history of prostate cancer. Nutrient adjusted for energy intake by residual method.
Rodriguez C (2004)
[42]
United States CPS-II Prospective cohort study Men selected from the CPS-II Nutrition Cohort 72,704 4281 Range: 50–74 1992–1999 Not reported Supplemental FFQ None, 1–31 IU/d, 32–≤400 IU/d, ≥400 IU/d Age, race, smoking status, BMI, education, energy adjusted calcium, total fat, lycopene intake, total calorie intake, family history of prostate cancer, and PSA history.
Schuurman (2002)
[43]
Netherlands NLCS Case-cohort study Men from the study population in NLCS 2167 642 Mean: 62.1
Range: 55–69
1986–1992 Up to 6.3 years Dietary, Supplemental FFQ, self-reported use of supplements Quintile medians: 7.1 mg/d, 10.4 mg/d, 13.5 mg/d, 17.3 mg/d, 23.6 mg/d Age, family history of prostate cancer, socioeconomic status, and alcohol from white or fortified wine.
Ramon JM (2000)
[44]
Spain - Case-control study Case: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer in hospital records
Controls: Hospital and population-based controls
651 217 - 1994–1998 - Dietary FFQ Quartile medians: 6.1 mg/d, 7.6 mg/d, 9.9 mg/d, 12.8 mg/d Age, residence, calories, family history and BMI.
Chan JM (2000)
[45]
United States HPFS Prospective cohort study Male health professionals 47,780 1896 Mean: 54.6
Range: 40–75
1986–1996 Not reported Supplemental FFQ and self-reported use of supplements 0 IU/d, 0.1–15.0 IU/d, 15.1–99.9 IU/d, ≥100 IU/d Age, period, family history of prostate cancer, vasectomy, smoking, quintiles of BMI, BMI at age 21, physical activity, quintiles of total calories, calcium, lycopene, fructose, and fat intake per day.
Deneo-Pellegrini H (1999)
[46]
Uruguay - Case-control study Case: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer admittted to major hospitals
Controls: Hospital-based controls
408 175 Range: 40–89 1994–1997 - Dietary FFQ Quartile ranges: ≤5.0 mg/d, 5.1–6.0 mg/d, 6.1–7.8 mg/, ≥7.9 mg/d Age, residence, urban/rural, family history of prostate cancer, BMI, total energy intake.
Jain MG (1999)
[47]
Canada - Case-control study Cases: Men recently diagnosed with prostate cancer identified by hospital admission offices or cancer registries
Controls: Population-based controls
1253 617 Mean: 69.9 1989–1993 - Dietary FFQ Quartile ranges: <17.17 mg/d, 17.17–25.30 mg/d, 25.31 mg/d, 37.25 mg/d, ≥37.25 mg/d Age, log total energy intake, vasectomy, marital status, ever smoke study area, BMI, education, ever-used multivitamin supplements, area of study, log-amounts for grains, fruits, vegetables, total plants, total carotenoids, folic acid, dietary fibre, conjugated linoleic acid, vitamin E, vitamin C, retinol, total fat, and linolenic acid.
Kristal AR (1999)
[48]
United States - Case-control study Men diagnosed with prostate cancer, identified from the Seattle-Puget Sound SEER cancer registry
Controls: Population-based controls
1363 697 Range: 40–64 1993–1996 - Supplemental Self-reported use of supplements Frequency of use: 0/week, <1/week, 1–6/week, ≥7/week Age, race, education, energy, family history of prostate cancer, body mass index, number of PSA tests in previous 5 years, dietary fat intake.
Heinonen OP (1998)
[9]
Finland ATBC RCT Male smokers residents 29,133 246 Mean 57.1
Range: 50–69
1985–1993 - Supplemental Intervention 50 mg/d vs. no use -
Key TJA (1997)
[49]
UK - Case-control study Cases: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer based on hospital registry records
Controls: Patients of the general pracitioners for cases
656 328 Mean: 68.1 1990–1994 - Dietary, Total FFQ Tertile ranges for dietary: <9.59 mg/d, 9.59–16.33 mg/d, ≥16.34 mg/d; Tertile ranges for total: <9.94 mg/d, 9.94–17.87 mg/d, ≥17.88 mg/d Energy.
Vlajinac HD (1997)
[50]
Serbia - Case-control study Cases: Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer
Controls: Hospital-based controls
303 101 Mean: 71.2 1990–1994 - Dietary FFQ Tertiles; no cut-off values reported Energy, protein, fat-total, saturated fatty acids, carbohydrate, sugar, fibre, retinol, retinol equivalent, folic acid, vitamin B12, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorous magnesium and iron.
Andersson SO (1996)
[51]
Sweden - Case-control study Cases: Male residents in Sweden diagnosed with prostate cancer, identified through hospital records
Controls: Population-based controls
1062 526 Mean: 70.6 1989–1994 - Dietary FFQ Quartiles: 4.5 mg/d, 5.7 mg/d, 7.3 mg/d Age and energy adjusted, based on nutrient residuals and energy in quartiles.
Shibata A (1992)
[52]
United States - Prospective cohort study Male residents of a retirement community 4252 207 Mean: 74.9 1981–1989 Up to 8 years Supplemental Self-reported use of supplements Use vs. no use Age and smoking habits.

ATBC: Alpha-tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study; BMI: Body mass index; CAPLIFE: Prostate cancer lifestyles study; CPS-II: Cancer Prevention Study II; CSDLH: Canadian Study of Diet, Lifestyle, and Health; FFQ: Food frequency questionnaire; FinsRPC: Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial; HPFS: Health Professionals Follow-up Study; HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation; HOPE-TOO: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation–The Ongoing Outcomes; MEC: Multiethnic Cohort; NIH-AARP: National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons; NLCS: Netherlands Cohort Study; PHS II: Physicians’ Health Study II; PLCO: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer; PSA: Prostate-specific antigen; RCT: Randomised controlled trial; SELECT: Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial; SU.VI.MAX: Supplementation en Vitamines et Mineraux Antioxydants;VITAL: VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL; WNYDS: Western New York Diet Study.