Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 30;23(1):399. doi: 10.3390/s23010399

Table 3.

Comparsion of some fluorescent chemosensors for Hg2+ detection.

Ref. Sensor Solvent LOD
10−6 M
[50] graphic file with name sensors-23-00399-i001.jpg water 2.0
[51] graphic file with name sensors-23-00399-i002.jpg C2H5OH/H2O (3/2) 2.4
[52] DNA-templated alloy Ag-Au nanoparticles - 5
[53] Cationic polydiacetylene - 8.3
[54] Gold Nanoparticles 1
[55] graphic file with name sensors-23-00399-i003.jpg Ethanol/water (4:1) 2.4
[56] graphic file with name sensors-23-00399-i004.jpg EtOH/H2O (5:95) 2.5
[57] porous triazene-based Cd-MOF DMF
Unstable in water 		0.22
[58] graphic file with name sensors-23-00399-i005.jpg Ethanol 149
[59] graphic file with name sensors-23-00399-i006.jpg ACN: H2O (8:2) 0.003
[60] graphic file with name sensors-23-00399-i007.jpg EtOH 6
[61] graphic file with name sensors-23-00399-i008.jpg water 0.5
Current work graphic file with name sensors-23-00399-i009.jpg water/ethanol 5:1 0.2