Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 8;50(22):13083–13099. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1137

Table 4.

Calorimetric binding data for native L3MBTL3 and RBPJ mutants

RBPJ K (M1) K d (μM) ΔG° (kcal/mol) ΔH° (kcal/mol) –TΔS° (kcal/mol) ΔΔG° (kcal/mol)
WT 1.1 ± 0.1 × 106 0.92 –8.3 ± 0.1 –13.1 ± 0.3 4.8 ± 0.3
BTD mutants E260A 2.6 ± 0.8 × 105 3.8*** –7.4 ± 0.2 –13.6 ± 3.4 6.2 ± 3.6 0.9
E260Kψ 2.2 ± 0.1 × 105 4.5** –7.3 ± 0.1 –16.8 ± 0.9 9.5 ± 0.9 1.0
F261A NBD
V263A 3.3 ± 0.9 × 105 3.0*** –7.5 ± 0.2 –10.3 ± 2.1 2.8 ± 2.3 0.8
K275M 2.4 ± 0.6 × 105 4.2*** –7.3 ± 0.1 –13.7 ± 1.4 6.4 ± 1.5 1.0
A284V NBD
Q333A 7.6 ± 1.5 × 105 1.3* –8.0 ± 0.1 –10.6 ± 1.0 2.6 ± 0.9 0.3

Constructs: L3MBTL3 (52–70) and RBPJ (53–474). All experiments were performed at 25°C. NBD represents no binding detected. ψN = 2 replicates. Values are the mean of at least three independent experiments and errors represent the standard deviation of multiple experiments. ΔΔG° = ΔG°(mutant) – ΔG°(mutant). P-value determined from a two-tailed t-test (***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05 and ns, not significant), comparing WT RBPJ to point mutants.