Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 8;146(1):307–320. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac043

Table 1.

Demographics of included brain donors

All donors FTLD-TDP FTLD-tau FTLD-FUS P-value
n (%) 87 (100%) 46/87 (53%) 34/87 (39%) 7/87 (8%)
Gender (M:F) 46:41 21:25 19:15 6:1 0.13a
Age at onset (years; mean ± SD) 57.6 ± 10.7 59.4 ± 9.4 56.9 ± 11.5 48.6 ± 11.4 0.04b,* (FTLD-TDP versus FTLD-FUS 0.03*)
Age at death (years; mean ± SD) 66.0 ± 9.7 67.4 ± 8.0 66.1 ± 10.6 56.1 ± 11.4 0.02b,* (FTLD-TDP versus FTLD-FUS 0.01*; FTLD-tau versus FTLD-FUS 0.03*)
Disease duration (years; mean ± SD) 8.4 ± 5.0 8.0 ± 4.7 9.2 ± 5.2 7.6 ± 6.5 0.54
Clinical diagnosis (%) 61/87 (70%) bvFTD; 21/87 (24%) PPA; 1/87 (1%) PSP; 4/87 (5%) ALS-FTD 28/46 (61%) bvFTD; 14/46 (30%) PPA; 4/46 (9%) ALS-FTD 27/34 (79%) bvFTD; 6/34 (18%) PPA; 1/34 (3%) PSP 5/7 (72%) bvFTD; 1/7 (14%) PPA; 1/7 (14%) CBS
Genetic status (%) 15/87 (17%) C9orf72; 11/87 (13%) MAPT; 6/87 (7%) GRN; 1/87 (1%) TARDBP 15/46 (33%) C9orf72; 6/46 (13%) GRN; 1/46 (2%) TARDBP 11/34 (32%) MAPT
Brain weight (g; mean ± SD) 1061.6 ± 166.7 1053.4 ± 160.7 1052.1 ± 180.1 1161.7 ± 117.1 0.26b
Pathological subgroups (% main pathology) 14/46 (31%) TDP-A; 13/46 (28%) TDP-B; 11/46 (24%) TDP-C; 6/46 (13%) TDP-E; 2/46 (4%) TDP-U 20/34 (59%) PiD; 3 (9%) CBD; 4 (12%) PSP; 7 (20%) tauopathy-U 5/7 (72%) aFTLD-U; 2/7 (28%) NIFID
Thal stage for amyloid-β (median ± IQR) 1 (0–2) 1 (0–3) 0 (0–1) 0 (0–0.5) 0.01c,* (FTLD-TDP versus FTLD-tau 0.04*)
Braak stage for tau (median ± IQR) 2 (0–2) 2 (0.5–2) NA 1 (0–2.25) NA
Braak stage for Lewy body pathology (median ± IQR) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0.07c

Values are expressed as %, mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median ± interquartile range (IQR). ADL = activities of daily living; ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; bvFTD = behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia; CBS = corticobasal syndrome; U = unknown (did not meet criteria for any specific subtype); aFTLD-U = atypical FTLD with ubiquitin inclusions; NIFID = neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease; PPA = primary progressive aphasia.

Pearson’s chi-squared test.

One-way ANOVA (Tukey's post hoc test).

Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA and pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction.

P < 0.05.