Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 7;76(1):78–88. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac704

Table 5.

Overall Response at Test of Cure by Resistance Class: Microbiologic Modified Intent-to-Treat Population

Outcome Sulopenem,
n/N (%)
Ertapenem,
n/N (%)
Difference, % (95% Confidence Interval)
Overall success at test of cure (primary end point) 301/444 (67.8) 325/440 (73.9) −6.1 (−12.0 to −.1)
ESBL-negative 219/329 (66.6) 238/311 (76.5) −10.0 (−16.9 to −3.0)
ȃQuinolone-resistant 47/69 (68.1) 51/79 (64.6) 3.6 (−12.0 to 18.6)
ȃQuinolone-susceptible 172/260 (66.2) 187/232 (80.6) −14.4 (−22.0 to −6.7)
ESBL-positive 79/110 (71.8) 85/125 (68.0) 3.8 (−7.9 to 15.5)
ȃQuinolone-resistant 64/92 (69.6) 64/99 (64.6) 4.9 (−8.5 to 18.1)
ȃQuinolone-susceptible 15/18 (83.3) 21/26 (80.8) 2.6 (−23.0 to 25.3)
Quinolone-resistant 112/162 (69.1) 116/179 (64.8) 4.3 (−5.6 to 14.3)
Quinolone-susceptible 189/282 (67.0) 209/260 (80.4) −13.4 (−20.7 to −6.1)
TMP-SMX–resistant 106/154 (68.8) 111/161 (68.9) −0.1 (−10.3 to 10.1)
TMP-SMX–susceptible 192/285 (67.4) 212/275 (77.1) −9.7 (−17.1 to −2.4)
ESBL-positive, quinolone-resistant, TMP-SMX–resistant 43/59 (72.9) 47/75 (62.7) 10.2 (−5.5 to 26.0)

ESBL testing was not performed on 5 sulopenem patients and 4 ertapenem patients.

Abbreviations: ESBL, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.